Skip to content

First Law of Entanglement and Quadratic Corrections

The entanglement first law is the linearization of an exact relative-entropy identity. It compares a normalized state family with one fixed reference state on one fixed algebra. The first nonzero relative-entropy term is then a positive quadratic form, not another linear law.

Required background. Relative entropy in QFT supplies the finite continuum comparison, and modular Hamiltonian definitions supply the generator and domain conventions.

The chapter overview first sets up a differentiable family and then separates the independent validity gates. Those checks remain in force below.

Begin in a finite-dimensional type-I regulator. Let σ>0\sigma>0 be a normalized reference density operator, let

Kσ=−log⁡σ,K_\sigma=-\log\sigma,

and let ρ\rho be normalized with supp⁡ρ⊆supp⁡σ\operatorname{supp}\rho\subseteq\operatorname{supp}\sigma. Direct substitution gives

S(ρ∥σ)=Δ⟨Kσ⟩−ΔS,S(\rho\Vert\sigma) =\Delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle-\Delta S,

where

Δ⟨Kσ⟩=Tr⁡[(ρ−σ)Kσ],ΔS=S(ρ)−S(σ).\Delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle =\operatorname{Tr}[(\rho-\sigma)K_\sigma], \qquad \Delta S=S(\rho)-S(\sigma).

This is an exact identity, with the comparison Hamiltonian KσK_\sigma held fixed. Blanco, Casini, Hung, and Myers 2013, §2, especially eqs. (2.9)–(2.11) use this identity and positivity in QFT. On a local type-III algebra, the intrinsic object is Araki relative entropy; a density matrix, S(ρ)S(\rho), and ⟨Kσ⟩\langle K_\sigma\rangle may exist only in a common regulator even when their displayed difference has a finite algebraic limit. Araki 1976, §1, pp. 809–810 gives the von Neumann-algebra definition and its density-matrix reduction.

Let

ρλ=σ+λX+λ22Y+O(λ3),Tr⁡X=Tr⁡Y=0.\rho_\lambda =\sigma+\lambda X+\frac{\lambda^2}{2}Y+O(\lambda^3), \qquad \operatorname{Tr}X=\operatorname{Tr}Y=0.

At a faithful interior point,

ddλS(ρλ∥σ)∣0=0.\left.\frac{d}{d\lambda}S(\rho_\lambda\Vert\sigma)\right|_0=0.

Differentiating the exact identity therefore yields

δS=δ⟨Kσ⟩=Tr⁡(XKσ).\delta S =\delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle =\operatorname{Tr}(XK_\sigma).

The normalization condition is essential: in the direct entropy derivative, the otherwise troublesome term is −Tr⁡X-\operatorname{Tr}X.

The Fréchet derivative of the logarithm at a faithful reference is

Tσ(X)=∫0∞dt (σ+t)−1X(σ+t)−1.\mathcal T_\sigma(X) =\int_0^\infty dt\, (\sigma+t)^{-1}X(\sigma+t)^{-1}.

Consequently,

S(ρλ∥σ)=λ22 χσ(X,X)+O(λ3),χσ(X,X)=Tr⁡[XTσ(X)].S(\rho_\lambda\Vert\sigma) =\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\, \chi_\sigma(X,X)+O(\lambda^3), \qquad \chi_\sigma(X,X) =\operatorname{Tr}[X\mathcal T_\sigma(X)].

The acceleration YY cancels from this Hessian because the first derivative of relative entropy vanishes at coincidence. In an eigenbasis σ=∑npn∣n⟩⟨n∣\sigma=\sum_n p_n\lvert n\rangle\langle n\rvert,

χσ(X,X)=∑m,nlog⁡pm−log⁡pnpm−pn∣Xmn∣2,\chi_\sigma(X,X) =\sum_{m,n} \frac{\log p_m-\log p_n}{p_m-p_n} \lvert X_{mn}\rvert^2,

with diagonal value 1/pn1/p_n. Every coefficient is positive. This is the Bogoliubov–Kubo–Mori quadratic form; Petz 1996, pp. 87–90 places it within the monotone-metric classification.

Combining the expansion with the exact identity gives the useful deficit formula

ΔS=Δ⟨Kσ⟩−λ22χσ(X,X)+O(λ3).\Delta S =\Delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle -\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\chi_\sigma(X,X) +O(\lambda^3).

The remainder is not automatic. For the linear family ρλ=σ+λX\rho_\lambda=\sigma+\lambda X, a sufficient finite-dimensional positivity condition is

∣λ∣ ∥σ−1/2Xσ−1/2∥<1.\lvert\lambda\rvert\, \left\lVert\sigma^{-1/2}X\sigma^{-1/2}\right\rVert<1.

A cubic remainder additionally requires three derivatives in a topology in which the logarithm is differentiable. Near a support change, relative entropy can be infinite or nonanalytic. In continuum QFT one should instead state a common algebra, a class of smeared or energy-bounded insertions, and the mode of regulator convergence; an operator-norm Taylor ball usually does not survive the type-III limit.

A regulated Gaussian vacuum restricted to a subregion decomposes into mixed Williamson modes. Take one such mode as the exactly solvable benchmark,

σ=(1−q)qN,q=e−ε,Kσ=−log⁡(1−q)+εN,\sigma=(1-q)q^N, \qquad q=e^{-\varepsilon}, \qquad K_\sigma=-\log(1-q)+\varepsilon N,

with 0<q<10<q<1, N=a†aN=a^\dagger a, and [a,a†]=1[a,a^\dagger]=1. This is faithful and trace class. Apply a coherent displacement

ρλ=D(λα)σD(λα)†,D(α)=eαa†−α∗a.\rho_\lambda =D(\lambda\alpha)\sigma D(\lambda\alpha)^\dagger, \qquad D(\alpha)=e^{\alpha a^\dagger-\alpha^*a}.

Unitary conjugation preserves the spectrum, so ΔS=0\Delta S=0. Since D(λα)†aD(λα)=a+λαD(\lambda\alpha)^\dagger aD(\lambda\alpha)=a+\lambda\alpha and the thermal one-point function of aa vanishes,

Δ⟨Kσ⟩=ελ2∣α∣2.\Delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle =\varepsilon\lambda^2\lvert\alpha\rvert^2.

The exact identity now gives

S(ρλ∥σ)=ελ2∣α∣2,χσ=2ε∣α∣2.S(\rho_\lambda\Vert\sigma) =\varepsilon\lambda^2\lvert\alpha\rvert^2, \qquad \chi_\sigma=2\varepsilon\lvert\alpha\rvert^2.

Thus the linear first law reads 0=00=0, while the first distinguishable response is exactly quadratic. For the reproducible choice q=1/2q=1/2, α=1/3\alpha=1/3, and λ=0.2\lambda=0.2,

ΔS=0,Δ⟨Kσ⟩=S(ρλ∥σ)=log⁡2225≃3.08065×10−3.\Delta S=0, \qquad \Delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle =S(\rho_\lambda\Vert\sigma) =\frac{\log2}{225} \simeq3.08065\times10^{-3}.

This analytic single-mode result has zero series and quadrature error. It is a regulator-level QFT benchmark, not a claim that a local continuum algebra factorizes into independent density-matrix modes. A numerical Fock truncation introduces a separate tail error and must be convergence-tested; it is not part of the exact result above.

Now replace the fixed comparison Hamiltonian by

Kλ=−log⁡ρλ=D(λα)KσD(λα)†.K_\lambda=-\log\rho_\lambda =D(\lambda\alpha)K_\sigma D(\lambda\alpha)^\dagger.

Then ⟨Kλ⟩ρλ=S(ρλ)=S(σ)\langle K_\lambda\rangle_{\rho_\lambda}=S(\rho_\lambda)=S(\sigma), so comparing the moving quantities gives the tautology 0=00=0 and hides the positive fixed-reference relative entropy. In general,

d2dλ2⟨Kλ⟩ρλ∣0=Tr⁡(YKσ)+2Tr⁡(XK˙0)+Tr⁡(σK¨0).\left.\frac{d^2}{d\lambda^2} \langle K_\lambda\rangle_{\rho_\lambda}\right|_0 =\operatorname{Tr}(YK_\sigma) +2\operatorname{Tr}(X\dot K_0) +\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma\ddot K_0).

Only the first term is the second variation of the fixed-reference modular energy. For the displaced mode, the last two terms sum to −2ε∣α∣2-2\varepsilon\lvert\alpha\rvert^2 and cancel its fixed-reference curvature. Without a prescription for K˙0\dot K_0 and K¨0\ddot K_0, the moving-reference comparison has an uncontrolled contribution.

The strongest surviving statement is therefore precise: normalization gives δS=δ⟨Kσ⟩\delta S=\delta\langle K_\sigma\rangle on a fixed algebra about a fixed faithful reference. It does not license replacing KσK_\sigma by the modular Hamiltonian of the perturbed state, nor does it control support-changing or moving-region families.

Treating the first law as dynamics. It follows from normalization and differentiability. Equations of motion or gravitational field equations require additional input.

Subtracting separately regulated quantities at different cutoffs. Entropy and modular energy must use the same algebra and regulator before their finite relative-entropy combination is formed.

Writing O(λ3)O(\lambda^3) at a support boundary. The logarithm is singular at zero eigenvalues. Restrict to the supported face or use an algebraic statement whose differentiability domain is established.

  1. Let ρλ=σ+λX+λ2Y/2+O(λ3)\rho_\lambda=\sigma+\lambda X+\lambda^2Y/2+O(\lambda^3) be normalized. Show directly that YY does not enter the quadratic coefficient of S(ρλ∥σ)S(\rho_\lambda\Vert\sigma).
Solution

Write F(ρ)=S(ρ∥σ)F(\rho)=S(\rho\Vert\sigma). At ρ=σ\rho=\sigma, the first derivative on normalized tangents is zero. The chain rule gives

d2dλ2F(ρλ)∣0=D2Fσ[X,X]+DFσ[Y].\left.\frac{d^2}{d\lambda^2}F(\rho_\lambda)\right|_0 =D^2F_\sigma[X,X]+DF_\sigma[Y].

The second term vanishes because Tr⁡Y=0\operatorname{Tr}Y=0. The Hessian is D2Fσ[X,X]=Tr⁡[XTσ(X)]D^2F_\sigma[X,X]=\operatorname{Tr}[X\mathcal T_\sigma(X)], so only XX remains.

  1. For σ=diag⁡(p,1−p)\sigma=\operatorname{diag}(p,1-p) and
X=(xzz∗−x),X=\begin{pmatrix}x&z\\ z^*&-x\end{pmatrix},

compute χσ(X,X)\chi_\sigma(X,X) and take the limit p→1/2p\to1/2.

Solution

The two diagonal entries contribute x2(1/p+1/(1−p))x^2(1/p+1/(1-p)). The two ordered off-diagonal entries contribute

2log⁡p−log⁡(1−p)2p−1∣z∣2.2\frac{\log p-\log(1-p)}{2p-1}\lvert z\rvert^2.

Hence

χσ=x2p(1−p)+2log⁡[p/(1−p)]2p−1∣z∣2.\chi_\sigma =\frac{x^2}{p(1-p)} +2\frac{\log[p/(1-p)]}{2p-1}\lvert z\rvert^2.

Both divided differences tend to 22 at p=1/2p=1/2, giving χσ=4(x2+∣z∣2)\chi_\sigma=4(x^2+\lvert z\rvert^2).

  1. For the coherent Gaussian family above, verify explicitly that the moving modular Hamiltonian cancels the fixed-reference quadratic response.
Solution

The fixed Hamiltonian gives

⟨Kσ⟩ρλ=⟨Kσ⟩σ+ελ2∣α∣2,\langle K_\sigma\rangle_{\rho_\lambda} =\langle K_\sigma\rangle_\sigma +\varepsilon\lambda^2\lvert\alpha\rvert^2,

so its second derivative is 2ε∣α∣22\varepsilon\lvert\alpha\rvert^2. By unitary covariance,

⟨Kλ⟩ρλ=Tr⁡[DσD†DKσD†]=Tr⁡(σKσ),\langle K_\lambda\rangle_{\rho_\lambda} =\operatorname{Tr} \left[D\sigma D^\dagger D K_\sigma D^\dagger\right] =\operatorname{Tr}(\sigma K_\sigma),

whose second derivative is zero. Therefore the terms containing K˙0\dot K_0 and K¨0\ddot K_0 in the product rule sum to −2ε∣α∣2-2\varepsilon\lvert\alpha\rvert^2. They remove, rather than compute, the fixed-reference relative-entropy curvature.

  • Araki, Huzihiro. “Relative Entropy of States of von Neumann Algebras.” Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 11 (1976): 809–833. DOI.
  • Blanco, David D., Horacio Casini, Ling-Yan Hung, and Robert C. Myers. “Relative Entropy and Holography.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, no. 8 (2013): 060. DOI; arXiv.
  • Petz, Dénes. “Monotone Metrics on Matrix Spaces.” Linear Algebra and its Applications 244 (1996): 81–96. DOI.

Original QFT.org content:CC BY 4.0, unless an item supplies different terms. Third-party material retains its own terms.