LSZ Reduction and Cross Sections
The previous pages explained how an interacting scalar field remembers physical particles: an exact two-point function has an isolated pole at the physical mass, and the residue of that pole is the wavefunction factor . This page turns that pole statement into observable physics.
There are two separate operations. First, LSZ reduction strips the external one-particle poles from time-ordered Green functions, leaving a finite on-shell scattering amplitude. Second, phase-space kinematics converts the squared amplitude into a transition rate, decay width, or cross section. The first step is field theory; the second step is relativistic probability bookkeeping.
This is the point where diagrams stop being merely a way to compute correlation functions and become a way to compute things measured in scattering experiments.
The nonrelativistic warm-up
Section titled “The nonrelativistic warm-up”Before discussing LSZ, it is useful to recall the familiar potential-scattering formula. For a nonrelativistic particle with free Hamiltonian and interaction , the resolvent has the Born expansion
where
The corresponding transition matrix is
For a transition from momentum to momentum , Fermi’s golden rule gives
This formula already has the three ingredients that survive in relativistic QFT: an amplitude, a conservation delta function, and a density of final states. Relativistic QFT replaces by the invariant amplitude , replaces the nonrelativistic density of states by the Lorentz-invariant phase-space measure, and obtains by amputating external poles of Green functions.
Asymptotic fields and the pole projection
Section titled “Asymptotic fields and the pole projection”Let be an interacting scalar field that has nonzero overlap with a stable one-particle state of mass . The exact two-point function has the pole form
near . Equivalently, at fixed spatial momentum,
for large , up to contributions from multiparticle continua. This is the key physical statement: at large time separation, the stable one-particle pole dominates the correlator.
The residue is an overlap. With covariant normalization,
If instead one uses the noncovariant normalization
then the same statement reads
That is the origin of the factors that appear when one converts time-dependent Green functions into transition probabilities.
The large-time two-point function separates into a stable pole contribution and a multiparticle spectral integral. Here . The continuum dephases at large , while the isolated pole leaves the persistent oscillation .
This is why the pole residue matters when Green functions are converted into scattering amplitudes: it tells us how strongly the chosen local field overlaps with the physical asymptotic particle. The residue is not by itself an observable—a field rescaling or a more general local field redefinition can change it—but LSZ uses precisely the compensating factors that make the final -matrix independent of that choice.
The LSZ pole statement
Section titled “The LSZ pole statement”Consider the connected momentum-space -point function
Translation invariance produces
For the physical process , choose
Then is exactly
This sign bookkeeping is easy to forget because on every external leg, so the pole factors look identical for incoming and outgoing particles. The momentum-conservation delta function is where the distinction is visible.
Near the one-particle poles of all external legs, the connected four-point function has the universal form
This equation is often the cleanest way to remember LSZ. A Green function has external poles because each field creates or destroys a one-particle state. The scattering amplitude is the finite coefficient that remains after those poles are removed.
The order of operations matters. One first multiplies by the inverse pole factors and only then takes the on-shell limit. Plugging into the unamputated Green function would hit the pole rather than extract its residue.
Equivalently, in the same convention,
This is the amputating operation: each factor removes the external pole, while each converts a field insertion into a normalized external particle.
LSZ reduction removes the universal external pole factors from the connected Green function. What remains is the finite on-shell amplitude .
A useful diagrammatic version is obtained by writing the connected four-point function near its poles as
Here is the full connected amputated four-point function, defined by removing the full external propagators but not yet normalizing external physical states. It includes contact and exchange contributions and should not be confused with only the 1PI four-point vertex of the effective action. Comparing with the LSZ pole statement gives
for four external scalar particles. More generally, each external scalar contributes a factor to the physical amplitude if the amputated vertex was defined using full propagators.
This is the bridge between the two languages used throughout perturbation theory: diagrams compute amputated Green functions, while experiments measure .
Invariant phase space
Section titled “Invariant phase space”The final-state density of states must be Lorentz invariant. For one on-shell particle, the invariant measure is
For final particles with total momentum , define
The delta function enforces total energy-momentum conservation; the product of measures counts Lorentz-invariant final states. This object is only the final-state measure. It does not include the initial flux factor, the squared amplitude, or possible symmetry factors for identical final particles.
The amplitude contains the dynamics. The invariant phase-space measure contains the universal kinematics and the energy-momentum conserving delta function.
For a decay of one particle with four-momentum into particles,
In the rest frame of the decaying particle, .
Here and below, removes overcounting of identical final particles. For example, if the phase-space integral labels two identical particles separately, then . For distinguishable final particles, .
For two-particle scattering,
the differential cross section is
In a frame where the incoming beams are collinear, the invariant flux can also be written as
The invariant form is the safest one outside simple beam or center-of-mass kinematics.
A cross section is a transition rate divided by incoming flux. The numerator is times final-state phase space; the denominator is the relativistic flux factor.
Two-body cross section
Section titled “Two-body cross section”For a process in the center-of-mass frame, let
and write for the magnitude of either incoming momentum and for the magnitude of either outgoing momentum. The two-body phase space reduces to
The flux factor in the center-of-mass frame is
Therefore
For elastic scattering of equal-mass particles, , so this simplifies to
This compact formula is one reason the invariant amplitude is so useful. All the complicated dynamics is in ; the rest is kinematics.
The φ⁴ check
Section titled “The φ⁴ check”Take a real scalar field with interaction
At tree level the four-point vertex gives
The outgoing quanta of this real field are identical. If the direction of one labeled final momentum is integrated over the full sphere, the symmetry factor gives
For equal masses and elastic scattering,
Equivalently, omit the factor and integrate over only one hemisphere, so that each unordered pair of final momenta is counted once. For a genuinely distinguishable contact-scattering process with the same constant amplitude, and the corresponding full-solid-angle formula has rather than in the denominator.
Summary
Section titled “Summary”LSZ reduction is the statement that particles are poles of exact Green functions. Each external field insertion supplies a universal pole and a universal residue factor. Removing those external factors leaves the invariant amplitude .
The amplitude is not yet a probability. To obtain a physical observable, one squares , multiplies by invariant final-state phase space, and divides by the appropriate initial normalization: for decay in the rest frame, or the relativistic flux factor for scattering.
Thus the conceptual chain is
The next page changes viewpoint again: by Wick rotating to Euclidean time, the oscillatory path integral becomes a statistical-mechanics-like Gaussian measure.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”- Forgetting the external factors. Amputating propagators is not the same as normalizing external physical states. If the field is not already normalized so that , LSZ supplies a for each external field in the reduction formula, or equivalently for each external particle in the amplitude built from an amputated vertex.
- Confusing Green functions with S-matrix elements. A time-ordered correlator is off shell and includes external propagators. The S-matrix amplitude is on shell and amputated.
- Dropping the flux factor. is a transition rate measure, not yet a cross section for a two-particle initial state.
- Double-counting identical final particles. The phase-space integral over labeled momenta counts identical configurations more than once unless a symmetry factor is included.
- Using nonrelativistic and relativistic normalizations in the same formula. The factors move between state normalizations, field overlaps, and phase-space measures.
- Setting external legs on shell too early. LSZ is a residue operation. Multiply by the inverse external propagators before taking the limit .
- Applying these formulas to unstable external particles. LSZ in this form assumes stable asymptotic one-particle states. Resonances are seen as poles of amplitudes, but they are not inserted as ordinary incoming or outgoing states.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Exercise 1: two-body phase space
Section titled “Exercise 1: two-body phase space”Derive the two-body phase-space formula
in the center-of-mass frame.
Solution
Start from
In the center-of-mass frame,
The spatial delta function sets
Let . Then
and
Use
on the support of the delta function. Hence
Therefore
Exercise 2: Residue factors from full amputation
Section titled “Exercise 2: Residue factors from full amputation”Suppose the connected four-point function near its external poles is written as
Using the LSZ pole statement on this page, determine in terms of .
Solution
The LSZ pole statement writes the same Green function as
Comparing the two expressions gives
The powers of are the same on both sides. The powers of give
Thus
This is the four-external-leg version of the general rule: each external scalar contributes one factor to the physical amplitude when the amputated vertex is defined by removing full propagators.
Exercise 3: two-body decay width
Section titled “Exercise 3: two-body decay width”A scalar particle of mass decays into two identical scalar particles of mass through
Assuming , compute the tree-level decay width .
Solution
The vertex rule gives
For a one-particle decay in the rest frame,
The factor is required because the final particles are identical. From Exercise 1,
where
Integrating over gives
Therefore
Substituting ,
Further reading
Section titled “Further reading”- Sidney Coleman, Lectures on Quantum Field Theory, edited by Bryan Gin-ge Chen et al., World Scientific, 2019, chapters 11–14.
- Michael E. Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, 1995, chapters 4 and 7.
- Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2007, sections 5, 10, and 11.
- Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 1995, sections 3.4 and 10.3.