Skip to content

Relativistic Scalar Action and Complex Fields

The previous page derived the real Klein–Gordon action, quantized its oscillator modes, and showed how positive and negative frequencies enter a Hermitian field. We now use that action as an organizing principle: it distinguishes real from complex fields, exposes internal symmetries, and provides the controlled route to interactions.

This page has three main goals. First, it compares the real and complex scalar actions without losing a factor of two. Second, it explains why a complex scalar field is not just a decorative complexification of a real one: it carries a conserved U(1)U(1) charge, which becomes particle number minus antiparticle number after quantization. Third, it shows how the familiar nonrelativistic Schrödinger field appears after factoring out e−imte^{-imt} and restricting to the slow particle sector.

The final formulas on the page introduce the first interacting relativistic scalar theory,

L=12∂μϕ ∂μϕ−12m2ϕ2−λ4!ϕ4,\mathcal L=\frac12\partial_\mu\phi\,\partial^\mu\phi-\frac12m^2\phi^2-\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4,

which will become the basic testing ground for perturbation theory.

A scalar field is defined by its transformation law. If two inertial frames use coordinates xμx^\mu and x′μ=Λμνxνx'^\mu=\Lambda^\mu{}_{\nu}x^\nu, then a scalar field satisfies

ϕ′(x′)=ϕ(x).\phi'(x')=\phi(x).

Equivalently,

ϕ′(x)=ϕ(Λ−1x).\phi'(x)=\phi(\Lambda^{-1}x).

For a boost in one spatial direction with velocity vv, using c=1c=1,

t′=t−vx1−v2,x′=x−vt1−v2,t'=\frac{t-vx}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}, \qquad x'=\frac{x-vt}{\sqrt{1-v^2}},

so the transformed scalar field is obtained by evaluating the original field at the inverse-transformed spacetime point. This is different from a vector or spinor field: a scalar has no extra matrix acting on internal components.

The free equation

(□+m2)ϕ=0,□=∂μ∂μ,(\Box+m^2)\phi=0, \qquad \Box=\partial_\mu\partial^\mu,

is Lorentz invariant because □\Box is a scalar differential operator. In the mostly-minus convention,

□=∂t2−∇2,\Box=\partial_t^2-\nabla^2,

so the equation becomes

(∂t2−∇2+m2)ϕ=0.(\partial_t^2-\nabla^2+m^2)\phi=0.

For a plane wave e−ip⋅xe^{-ip\cdot x}, this again gives p2=m2p^2=m^2 and p0=±ωpp^0=\pm\omega_{\boldsymbol p}, with ωp=p2+m2\omega_{\boldsymbol p}=\sqrt{\boldsymbol p^2+m^2}.

For reference, the simplest Lorentz-invariant action for one real scalar field is the action derived on the previous page,

S=∫d4x L,LR=12∂μϕ ∂μϕ−12m2ϕ2.S=\int d^4x\,\mathcal L, \qquad \mathcal L_{\mathbb R}=\frac12\partial_\mu\phi\,\partial^\mu\phi-\frac12m^2\phi^2.

In space-plus-time notation,

LR=12ϕ˙2−12(∇ϕ)2−12m2ϕ2.\mathcal L_{\mathbb R} =\frac12\dot\phi^2-\frac12(\nabla\phi)^2-\frac12m^2\phi^2.

For smooth variations with compact support in the spacetime interior, the variation is

δS=∫d4x (∂μϕ ∂μδϕ−m2ϕ δϕ)=−∫d4x δϕ (□+m2)ϕ,\begin{aligned} \delta S &=\int d^4x\,\left(\partial_\mu\phi\,\partial^\mu\delta\phi-m^2\phi\,\delta\phi\right) \\ &=-\int d^4x\,\delta\phi\,(\Box+m^2)\phi, \end{aligned}

where the surface term vanishes under the stated variation. A boundary-value problem instead requires compatible allowed boundary variations and, where needed, a boundary action. Stationarity in the interior gives

(□+m2)ϕ=0.(\Box+m^2)\phi=0.

The canonical momentum is

π=∂L∂ϕ˙=ϕ˙,\pi=\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\dot\phi}=\dot\phi,

and the Hamiltonian density is

HR=πϕ˙−LR=12π2+12(∇ϕ)2+12m2ϕ2.\mathcal H_{\mathbb R} =\pi\dot\phi-\mathcal L_{\mathbb R} =\frac12\pi^2+\frac12(\nabla\phi)^2+\frac12m^2\phi^2.

This positivity is important. The Klein–Gordon equation has both frequency signs, but the canonical Hamiltonian of the quantized free field is bounded below once the negative-frequency part is interpreted as creation operators rather than negative-energy particles.

A real scalar theory with only even powers of ϕ\phi has the discrete symmetry

ϕ⟼−ϕ.\phi\longmapsto -\phi.

For the free theory this symmetry is automatic. For an interacting theory, it is a choice: a term gϕ3g\phi^3 would break it, while λϕ4\lambda\phi^4 preserves it.

A complex scalar field is equivalent to two real scalar fields. With the canonical normalization

ϕ=12(ϕ1+iϕ2),ϕ∗=12(ϕ1−iϕ2),\phi=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\phi_1+i\phi_2), \qquad \phi^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\phi_1-i\phi_2),

the Lagrangian

LC=∂μϕ∗ ∂μϕ−m2ϕ∗ϕ\mathcal L_{\mathbb C}=\partial_\mu\phi^*\,\partial^\mu\phi-m^2\phi^*\phi

becomes

LC=12∂μϕ1∂μϕ1+12∂μϕ2∂μϕ2−12m2(ϕ12+ϕ22).\mathcal L_{\mathbb C} =\frac12\partial_\mu\phi_1\partial^\mu\phi_1 +\frac12\partial_\mu\phi_2\partial^\mu\phi_2 -\frac12m^2(\phi_1^2+\phi_2^2).

Thus the free complex scalar is a pair of equal-mass real scalars. The new structure is the rotational symmetry in the internal (ϕ1,ϕ2)(\phi_1,\phi_2) plane.

The factor 1/21/\sqrt2 belongs together with the absence of an overall 1/21/2 in LC\mathcal L_{\mathbb C}. An equally valid convention is

Φ=ϕ1+iϕ2,LC=12∂μΦ∗∂μΦ−12m2Φ∗Φ.\Phi=\phi_1+i\phi_2, \qquad \mathcal L_{\mathbb C} =\frac12\partial_\mu\Phi^*\partial^\mu\Phi -\frac12m^2\Phi^*\Phi.

Mixing the definition of Φ\Phi from this convention with the Lagrangian prefactor from the previous convention would double the action, canonical momenta, and Noether charge.

Real scalar reflection symmetry and complex scalar phase rotation

A real scalar with an even potential has the discrete symmetry ϕ↦−ϕ\phi\mapsto-\phi. A complex scalar has a continuous U(1)U(1) phase symmetry, equivalently rotations in the (ϕ1,ϕ2)(\phi_1,\phi_2) plane.

With the same compact-support premise, the Euler–Lagrange equations are obtained by treating ϕ\phi and ϕ∗\phi^* as independent variables during variation, equivalently varying the two real components:

∂L∂ϕ∗−∂μ∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)=0.\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi^*} -\partial_\mu\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi^*)}=0.

Since

∂L∂ϕ∗=−m2ϕ,∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)=∂μϕ,\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi^*}=-m^2\phi, \qquad \frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi^*)}=\partial^\mu\phi,

we get

(□+m2)ϕ=0.(\Box+m^2)\phi=0.

The conjugate equation follows by varying ϕ\phi:

(□+m2)ϕ∗=0.(\Box+m^2)\phi^*=0.

The canonical momenta are slightly easy to misread:

πϕ=∂L∂ϕ˙=ϕ˙∗,πϕ∗=∂L∂ϕ˙∗=ϕ˙.\pi_\phi=\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\dot\phi}=\dot\phi^*, \qquad \pi_{\phi^*}=\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\dot\phi^*}=\dot\phi.

So the Hamiltonian density is

HC=ϕ˙∗ϕ˙+∇ϕ∗⋅∇ϕ+m2ϕ∗ϕ.\mathcal H_{\mathbb C} =\dot\phi^*\dot\phi+\nabla\phi^*\cdot\nabla\phi+m^2\phi^*\phi.

In terms of the two real fields, this is just the sum of two real scalar Hamiltonians.

The complex scalar Lagrangian is invariant under a global phase rotation. Fixing an orientation for its Noether generator, choose

ϕ⟼e−iαϕ,ϕ∗⟼eiαϕ∗,\phi\longmapsto e^{-i\alpha}\phi, \qquad \phi^*\longmapsto e^{i\alpha}\phi^*,

where α\alpha is constant. The infinitesimal variations are

δϕ=−iαϕ,δϕ∗=iαϕ∗.\delta\phi=-i\alpha\phi, \qquad \delta\phi^*=i\alpha\phi^*.

Noether’s theorem gives

jμ=∂L∂(∂μϕ)δϕα+∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)δϕ∗α=−iϕ ∂μϕ∗+iϕ∗∂μϕ.\begin{aligned} j^\mu &=\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\frac{\delta\phi}{\alpha} +\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi^*)}\frac{\delta\phi^*}{\alpha} \\ &=-i\phi\,\partial^\mu\phi^*+i\phi^*\partial^\mu\phi. \end{aligned}

Thus

jμ=i(ϕ∗∂μϕ−ϕ∂μϕ∗).j^\mu=i\left(\phi^*\partial^\mu\phi-\phi\partial^\mu\phi^*\right).

Using the equations of motion,

∂μjμ=i(∂μϕ∗∂μϕ+ϕ∗□ϕ−∂μϕ∂μϕ∗−ϕ□ϕ∗)=i(ϕ∗(−m2ϕ)−ϕ(−m2ϕ∗))=0.\begin{aligned} \partial_\mu j^\mu &=i\left(\partial_\mu\phi^*\partial^\mu\phi+\phi^*\Box\phi -\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi^*-\phi\Box\phi^*\right) \\ &=i\left(\phi^*(-m^2\phi)-\phi(-m^2\phi^*)\right) \\ &=0. \end{aligned}

If the spatial integral exists and the net current flux through its boundary vanishes, for example with suitable decay or periodic boundary conditions, the conserved charge is

Q=∫d3x j0=i∫d3x (ϕ∗ϕ˙−ϕϕ˙∗).Q=\int d^3x\,j^0 =i\int d^3x\,\left(\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^*\right).

In real components, with πi=ϕ˙i\pi_i=\dot\phi_i,

Q=∫d3x (ϕ2π1−ϕ1π2).Q=\int d^3x\,\left(\phi_2\pi_1-\phi_1\pi_2\right).

So electric-type charge is literally angular momentum in the internal two-dimensional field space, up to the orientation convention for the phase rotation.

The sign can be checked directly after quantization. With the unitary rotation

U(α)=eiαQ,U(\alpha)=e^{i\alpha Q},

the transformation U(α)ϕU(α)†=e−iαϕU(\alpha)\phi U(\alpha)^\dagger=e^{-i\alpha}\phi implies

[Q,ϕ]=−ϕ,[Q,ϕ†]=+ϕ†.[Q,\phi]=-\phi, \qquad [Q,\phi^\dagger]=+\phi^\dagger.

Thus ϕ\phi has operator charge −1-1: acting with it lowers the charge of a state by one unit. The particle and antiparticle creation operators below make the corresponding state charges explicit.

Particles and antiparticles of a complex scalar

Section titled “Particles and antiparticles of a complex scalar”

For the free quantum construction, take m>0m>0 and select the vacuum annihilated by both oscillator families. The real scalar field used one family because hermiticity tied the positive- and negative-frequency coefficients together. A complex scalar is not Hermitian, so these coefficients are independent. Point fields and momentum kets are distributional shorthand, interpreted after smearing. After quantization, the classical complex conjugate ϕ∗\phi^* is written as the Hermitian adjoint ϕ†\phi^\dagger:

ϕ(x)=∫p12ωp(ape−iωpt+ip⋅x+bp†eiωpt−ip⋅x),\phi(x)=\int_{\boldsymbol p}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_{\boldsymbol p}}} \left( a_{\boldsymbol p}e^{-i\omega_{\boldsymbol p}t+i\boldsymbol p\cdot\boldsymbol x} +b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger e^{i\omega_{\boldsymbol p}t-i\boldsymbol p\cdot\boldsymbol x} \right),

and

ϕ†(x)=∫p12ωp(ap†eiωpt−ip⋅x+bpe−iωpt+ip⋅x),\phi^\dagger(x)=\int_{\boldsymbol p}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_{\boldsymbol p}}} \left( a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger e^{i\omega_{\boldsymbol p}t-i\boldsymbol p\cdot\boldsymbol x} +b_{\boldsymbol p}e^{-i\omega_{\boldsymbol p}t+i\boldsymbol p\cdot\boldsymbol x} \right),

where

∫p≡∫d3p(2π)3.\int_{\boldsymbol p}\equiv\int\frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}.

The nonzero commutators are

[ap,aq†]=(2π)3δ(3)(p−q),[bp,bq†]=(2π)3δ(3)(p−q).[a_{\boldsymbol p},a_{\boldsymbol q}^\dagger]=(2\pi)^3\delta^{(3)}(\boldsymbol p-\boldsymbol q), \qquad [b_{\boldsymbol p},b_{\boldsymbol q}^\dagger]=(2\pi)^3\delta^{(3)}(\boldsymbol p-\boldsymbol q).

For the following quadratic Hamiltonian and charge calculation, first use a periodic box and a finite inversion-symmetric momentum cutoff; the box alone is not a UV cutoff. Normal order the original quadratic field expressions in the selected vacuum. The displayed integrals are continuum notation for the resulting vacuum-relative generators, defined on their Fock-space operator domains, rather than subtraction of an infinite constant. This regulator is local to this calculation: the continuum commutators above retain their full distributional delta, whereas the finite-cutoff field commutator has a truncated periodic kernel. The normal-ordered Hamiltonian is

:H:=∫pωp(ap†ap+bp†bp).:H: =\int_{\boldsymbol p}\omega_{\boldsymbol p} \left(a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger a_{\boldsymbol p}+b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger b_{\boldsymbol p}\right).

Both particle and antiparticle excitations have positive energy. The regulated charge calculation gives one explicit operator ordering. Our classical factor order −ϕϕ˙∗-\phi\dot\phi^* and that calculation’s quantum order −ϕ˙†ϕ-\dot\phi^\dagger\phi can differ by a contact c-number at finite cutoff. Normal ordering fixes any such ordering-dependent constant by requiring zero vacuum charge; no particular bare constant applies to every ordering. The vacuum-neutral charge is

:Q:=∫p(ap†ap−bp†bp).:Q: =\int_{\boldsymbol p}\left(a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger a_{\boldsymbol p}-b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger b_{\boldsymbol p}\right).

Thus ap†∣0⟩a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger|0\rangle and bp†∣0⟩b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger|0\rangle have opposite charges. With the convention above, a†a^\dagger creates charge +1+1 quanta and b†b^\dagger creates charge −1-1 quanta.

With this vacuum-neutral prescription, writing QQ for the normalized generator, we have

[Q,ap†]=ap†,[Q,bp†]=−bp†.[Q,a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger]=a_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger, \qquad [Q,b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger]=-b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger.

These commutators verify both the relative sign in Q=Na−NbQ=N_a-N_b and the charge assignment of the two one-particle states.

Mode expansion of a complex scalar field with particle and antiparticle oscillators

A complex scalar has independent positive- and negative-frequency oscillator families. The field ϕ\phi annihilates a charge +1+1 particle through apa_{\boldsymbol p} and creates a charge −1-1 antiparticle through bp†b_{\boldsymbol p}^\dagger. The conserved charge is :Q:=Na−Nb:Q:=N_a-N_b.

This is the clean field-theoretic interpretation of negative frequencies. They do not describe particles with negative energy. They create antiparticles with positive energy and opposite charge.

For m>0m>0 and ∣p∣≪m|\boldsymbol p|\ll m,

ωp=m+p22m+O(∣p∣4/m3).\omega_{\boldsymbol p}=m+\frac{\boldsymbol p^2}{2m}+O(|\boldsymbol p|^4/m^3).

The rest energy mm produces rapid time dependence. To isolate slow nonrelativistic motion, write the complex scalar field as

ϕ(x)=e−imt2mψ(x),\phi(x)=\frac{e^{-imt}}{\sqrt{2m}}\psi(x),

This rephasing is invertible and alone removes no modes. We additionally restrict ψ\psi to residual frequencies much smaller than mm. The original antiparticle term would give e+i(ωp+m)te^{+i(\omega_{\boldsymbol p}+m)t} in ψ\psi, approximately e2imte^{2imt} at low momentum, and is excluded by this slow-branch restriction. The separation of order 2m2m is relative to the removed particle rest phase; particle and antiparticle excitations both have positive energy.

Substitute into the relativistic Lagrangian

LC=∣ϕ˙∣2−∣∇ϕ∣2−m2∣ϕ∣2.\mathcal L_{\mathbb C}=|\dot\phi|^2-|\nabla\phi|^2-m^2|\phi|^2.

The time-derivative term gives

ϕ˙=e−imt2m(ψ˙−imψ),\dot\phi=\frac{e^{-imt}}{\sqrt{2m}}(\dot\psi-im\psi),

so

∣ϕ˙∣2−m2∣ϕ∣2=i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)+12m∣ψ˙∣2.|\dot\phi|^2-m^2|\phi|^2 =\frac{i}{2}\left(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi\right) +\frac{1}{2m}|\dot\psi|^2.

The spatial term is

−∣∇ϕ∣2=−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ.-|\nabla\phi|^2=-\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi.

Therefore

L=i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ+12m∣ψ˙∣2.\mathcal L =\frac{i}{2}\left(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi\right) -\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi +\frac{1}{2m}|\dot\psi|^2.

The last term is suppressed for slowly varying fields, with ∣ψ˙∣≪m∣ψ∣|\dot\psi|\ll m|\psi|. Dropping it gives

LNR=i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ.\mathcal L_{\mathrm{NR}} =\frac{i}{2}\left(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi\right) -\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi.

Up to a total time derivative, which leaves the interior equations unchanged for compactly supported or compatible endpoint variations, this is the usual Schrödinger-field Lagrangian

LNR=iψ∗ψ˙−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ.\mathcal L_{\mathrm{NR}} =i\psi^*\dot\psi-\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi.

The equation of motion is

iψ˙=−∇22mψ.i\dot\psi=-\frac{\nabla^2}{2m}\psi.

The charge density also reduces to the nonrelativistic particle density. Substituting ϕ=e−imtψ/2m\phi=e^{-imt}\psi/\sqrt{2m} into j0=i(ϕ∗ϕ˙−ϕϕ˙∗)j^0=i(\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^*) gives

j0=∣ψ∣2+i2m(ψ∗ψ˙−ψψ˙∗).j^0=|\psi|^2+\frac{i}{2m}(\psi^*\dot\psi-\psi\dot\psi^*) .

At low energy the second term is suppressed, so

Q≃∫d3x ψ∗ψ.Q\simeq\int d^3x\,\psi^*\psi.

So the nonrelativistic complex field is the slowly varying envelope left after removing the relativistic rest-energy phase, and its number operator is the low-energy form of the relativistic U(1)U(1) charge.

The rest-energy factor is inert under the internal symmetry, so ψ→e−iαψ\psi\to e^{-i\alpha}\psi. Consequently [Q,ψ]=−ψ[Q,\psi]=-\psi, exactly as expected for a nonrelativistic annihilation field whose number operator is Q≃∫d3x ψ∗ψQ\simeq\int d^3x\,\psi^*\psi.

Factoring out the rest-energy oscillation to obtain a nonrelativistic Schrödinger field

The relativistic field contains a fast carrier phase e−imte^{-imt}. The nonrelativistic field ψ\psi is the slowly varying envelope that remains after the rest energy is factored out and antiparticle modes are neglected.

This derivation also explains why nonrelativistic field theory is first order in time while the Klein–Gordon field is second order. The second time derivative is still present in the small correction ∣ψ˙∣2/(2m)|\dot\psi|^2/(2m), but it is subleading in the low-energy expansion.

The action principle makes it obvious how to add local interactions. For one real scalar field, the standard quartic theory is

L=12∂μϕ ∂μϕ−12m2ϕ2−λ4!ϕ4.\mathcal L =\frac12\partial_\mu\phi\,\partial^\mu\phi -\frac12m^2\phi^2 -\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4.

The factor 4!4! is a bookkeeping convention chosen so that four functional derivatives of the interaction bring down a simple factor λ\lambda in perturbation theory.

The interacting Euler–Lagrange equation is

(□+m2)ϕ+λ3!ϕ3=0.(\Box+m^2)\phi+\frac{\lambda}{3!}\phi^3=0.

The plus sign of the nonlinear term follows from writing the potential with a minus sign in L\mathcal L. For λ≥0\lambda\ge 0, the quartic contribution to the Hamiltonian is nonnegative; a theory with only this quartic interaction and λ<0\lambda<0 has no stable ground state.

The conjugate momentum is still π=ϕ˙\pi=\dot\phi, and the Hamiltonian is

H=H0+V,H=H_0+V,

with

H0=∫d3x 12(π2+(∇ϕ)2+m2ϕ2),H_0=\int d^3x\,\frac12\left(\pi^2+(\nabla\phi)^2+m^2\phi^2\right),

and

V=∫d3x λ4!ϕ4.V=\int d^3x\,\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4.

In the Schrödinger picture,

iddt∣Ψ(t)⟩=(H0+V)∣Ψ(t)⟩.i\frac{d}{dt}|\Psi(t)\rangle=(H_0+V)|\Psi(t)\rangle.

This is the exact same formal structure as ordinary quantum mechanics, but now H0H_0 describes infinitely many oscillator modes and VV couples them. The next page begins the interaction-picture expansion that turns this equation into time-ordered perturbation theory.

For a complex scalar, a derivative-free U(1)U(1)-preserving quartic interaction is instead

Lint=−λ4(ϕ∗ϕ)2,\mathcal L_{\mathrm{int}}=-\frac{\lambda}{4}(\phi^*\phi)^2,

or with another normalization convention, −λ(ϕ∗ϕ)2-\lambda(\phi^*\phi)^2. For the displayed −λ(ϕ∗ϕ)2/4-\lambda(\phi^*\phi)^2/4 convention, variation with respect to ϕ∗\phi^* gives

(□+m2)ϕ+λ2(ϕ∗ϕ)ϕ=0.(\Box+m^2)\phi+\frac{\lambda}{2}(\phi^*\phi)\phi=0.

The numerical coefficient changes when the coupling convention changes. More generally, any derivative-free potential U(ϕ∗ϕ)U(\phi^*\phi) preserves the phase symmetry and the charge derived above.

At leading order in the nonrelativistic expansion and at tree level, this interaction makes contact with the earlier Bose-gas interaction. With the normalization above,

(ϕ∗ϕ)2⟶(ψ∗ψ)24m2,(\phi^*\phi)^2\longrightarrow\frac{(\psi^*\psi)^2}{4m^2},

so

Lint⟶−λ16m2(ψ∗ψ)2.\mathcal L_{\mathrm{int}}\longrightarrow-\frac{\lambda}{16m^2}(\psi^*\psi)^2.

If the nonrelativistic Lagrangian is written as −g(ψ∗ψ)2/2-g(\psi^*\psi)^2/2, then this convention gives g=λ/(8m2)g=\lambda/(8m^2). Different normalizations of the relativistic quartic simply rescale this matching relation.

The Klein–Gordon equation is best understood as the Euler–Lagrange equation of a Lorentz-invariant scalar action. For a real scalar, the free Lagrangian is

LR=12(∂ϕ)2−12m2ϕ2,\mathcal L_{\mathbb R}=\frac12(\partial\phi)^2-\frac12m^2\phi^2,

with canonical momentum π=ϕ˙\pi=\dot\phi and positive Hamiltonian density 12π2+12(∇ϕ)2+12m2ϕ2\frac12\pi^2+\frac12(\nabla\phi)^2+\frac12m^2\phi^2.

A complex scalar field is equivalent to two real scalars, but it has an extra continuous U(1)U(1) symmetry. Noether’s theorem turns that symmetry into a conserved charge. After quantization, the charge counts particles minus antiparticles,

:Q:=Na−Nb,:Q:=N_a-N_b,

while the Hamiltonian counts the positive energies of both.

For m>0m>0, the nonrelativistic Schrödinger field emerges by removing the rest-energy phase e−imte^{-imt} and separately restricting to the slow particle branch at small momentum. The familiar first-order time derivative in the Schrödinger Lagrangian is therefore the leading term of this low-energy expansion.

Finally, the quartic interaction λϕ4/4!\lambda\phi^4/4! gives the first local interacting scalar field theory. It prepares the way for the interaction picture, Dyson expansion, Wick contractions, and Feynman diagrams.

A common mistake is to treat ϕ\phi and ϕ∗\phi^* as dependent during variation. In the Euler–Lagrange calculation for a complex field, they are varied independently; the complex conjugation relation is imposed after deriving the equations.

A second normalization mistake is to write ϕ=ϕ1+iϕ2\phi=\phi_1+i\phi_2 while retaining LC=∣∂ϕ∣2−m2∣ϕ∣2\mathcal L_{\mathbb C}=|\partial\phi|^2-m^2|\phi|^2. That convention gives twice the sum of the canonically normalized real-field actions. Either include 1/21/\sqrt2 in the field definition or include 1/21/2 in the complex-field Lagrangian.

A third trap is to confuse the U(1)U(1) charge with ordinary particle number. For a free complex scalar, NaN_a and NbN_b are separately conserved, but the robust symmetry-protected quantity is Q=Na−NbQ=N_a-N_b. Interactions that preserve U(1)U(1) can create particle–antiparticle pairs while keeping QQ fixed.

A fourth trap is to think that negative-frequency modes are negative-energy particles. In the complex field, the negative-frequency coefficient is an independent creation operator for antiparticles. The Hamiltonian remains positive.

A fifth trap is to miss the total derivative in the nonrelativistic limit. The symmetrized term

i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)\frac{i}{2}(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi)

and the simpler term iψ∗ψ˙i\psi^*\dot\psi differ by a total time derivative. They give the same interior equations with compactly supported or compatible endpoint variations; arbitrary boundary data need not give equivalent actions.

A sixth trap is to think that the rest-phase redefinition itself discards antiparticles. It is the additional slow particle-sector restriction that does so; the approximation requires small momentum and small residual frequencies and does not describe pair production.

Exercise 1: Noether current of the complex scalar

Section titled “Exercise 1: Noether current of the complex scalar”

For

L=∂μϕ∗∂μϕ−m2ϕ∗ϕ,\mathcal L=\partial_\mu\phi^*\partial^\mu\phi-m^2\phi^*\phi,

use the infinitesimal transformation

δϕ=−iαϕ,δϕ∗=iαϕ∗\delta\phi=-i\alpha\phi, \qquad \delta\phi^*=i\alpha\phi^*

to derive the conserved current.

Solution

The Noether current is

jμ=∂L∂(∂μϕ)δϕα+∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)δϕ∗α.j^\mu =\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\frac{\delta\phi}{\alpha} +\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi^*)}\frac{\delta\phi^*}{\alpha}.

Since

∂L∂(∂μϕ)=∂μϕ∗,∂L∂(∂μϕ∗)=∂μϕ,\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}=\partial^\mu\phi^*, \qquad \frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi^*)}=\partial^\mu\phi,

we get

jμ=∂μϕ∗(−iϕ)+∂μϕ(iϕ∗).j^\mu=\partial^\mu\phi^*(-i\phi)+\partial^\mu\phi(i\phi^*).

Thus

jμ=i(ϕ∗∂μϕ−ϕ∂μϕ∗).j^\mu=i(\phi^*\partial^\mu\phi-\phi\partial^\mu\phi^*).

Using (□+m2)ϕ=0(\Box+m^2)\phi=0 and its complex conjugate gives ∂μjμ=0\partial_\mu j^\mu=0.

Exercise 2: charge as internal angular momentum

Section titled “Exercise 2: charge as internal angular momentum”

Let

ϕ=12(ϕ1+iϕ2).\phi=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\phi_1+i\phi_2).

Show that

Q=i∫d3x (ϕ∗ϕ˙−ϕϕ˙∗)Q=i\int d^3x\,(\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^*)

is equal to

Q=∫d3x (ϕ2π1−ϕ1π2),πi=ϕ˙i.Q=\int d^3x\,(\phi_2\pi_1-\phi_1\pi_2), \qquad \pi_i=\dot\phi_i.
Solution

First compute

ϕ∗ϕ˙=12(ϕ1−iϕ2)(ϕ˙1+iϕ˙2)=12(ϕ1ϕ˙1+ϕ2ϕ˙2+iϕ1ϕ˙2−iϕ2ϕ˙1).\phi^*\dot\phi =\frac12(\phi_1-i\phi_2)(\dot\phi_1+i\dot\phi_2) =\frac12\left(\phi_1\dot\phi_1+\phi_2\dot\phi_2+i\phi_1\dot\phi_2-i\phi_2\dot\phi_1\right).

Similarly,

ϕϕ˙∗=12(ϕ1ϕ˙1+ϕ2ϕ˙2−iϕ1ϕ˙2+iϕ2ϕ˙1).\phi\dot\phi^* =\frac12\left(\phi_1\dot\phi_1+\phi_2\dot\phi_2-i\phi_1\dot\phi_2+i\phi_2\dot\phi_1\right).

Subtracting,

ϕ∗ϕ˙−ϕϕ˙∗=i(ϕ1ϕ˙2−ϕ2ϕ˙1).\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^* =i(\phi_1\dot\phi_2-\phi_2\dot\phi_1).

Therefore

i(ϕ∗ϕ˙−ϕϕ˙∗)=ϕ2ϕ˙1−ϕ1ϕ˙2.i(\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^*) =\phi_2\dot\phi_1-\phi_1\dot\phi_2.

Since πi=ϕ˙i\pi_i=\dot\phi_i,

Q=∫d3x (ϕ2π1−ϕ1π2).Q=\int d^3x\,(\phi_2\pi_1-\phi_1\pi_2).

This is the angular momentum generator for rotations in the internal (ϕ1,ϕ2)(\phi_1,\phi_2) plane, with the orientation fixed by the phase convention.

Exercise 3: nonrelativistic limit of the complex scalar

Section titled “Exercise 3: nonrelativistic limit of the complex scalar”

Take m>0m>0, restrict to the slow particle branch with ∣p∣≪m|\boldsymbol p|\ll m and residual frequencies much smaller than mm, and use compactly supported or compatible endpoint variations. Set

ϕ=e−imt2mψ\phi=\frac{e^{-imt}}{\sqrt{2m}}\psi

in

L=∣ϕ˙∣2−∣∇ϕ∣2−m2∣ϕ∣2.\mathcal L=|\dot\phi|^2-|\nabla\phi|^2-m^2|\phi|^2.

Show that the leading low-energy Lagrangian is

LNR=iψ∗ψ˙−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ\mathcal L_{\mathrm{NR}} =i\psi^*\dot\psi-\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi

up to a total derivative.

Solution

The time derivative is

ϕ˙=e−imt2m(ψ˙−imψ).\dot\phi=\frac{e^{-imt}}{\sqrt{2m}}(\dot\psi-im\psi).

Then

∣ϕ˙∣2=12m(∣ψ˙∣2+m2∣ψ∣2+imψ∗ψ˙−imψ˙∗ψ).|\dot\phi|^2 =\frac{1}{2m}\left(|\dot\psi|^2+m^2|\psi|^2+i m\psi^*\dot\psi-i m\dot\psi^*\psi\right).

Also

m2∣ϕ∣2=m2∣ψ∣2,∣∇ϕ∣2=12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ.m^2|\phi|^2=\frac{m}{2}|\psi|^2, \qquad |\nabla\phi|^2=\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi.

The rest-energy terms cancel, leaving

L=i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ+12m∣ψ˙∣2.\mathcal L =\frac{i}{2}(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi) -\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi +\frac{1}{2m}|\dot\psi|^2.

At low energy, ∣ψ˙∣≪m∣ψ∣|\dot\psi|\ll m|\psi|, so the last term is higher order. Finally,

i2(ψ∗ψ˙−ψ˙∗ψ)=iψ∗ψ˙−i2ddt(ψ∗ψ),\frac{i}{2}(\psi^*\dot\psi-\dot\psi^*\psi) =i\psi^*\dot\psi-\frac{i}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\psi^*\psi),

so it differs from iψ∗ψ˙i\psi^*\dot\psi only by a total derivative. Hence

LNR=iψ∗ψ˙−12m∇ψ∗⋅∇ψ.\mathcal L_{\mathrm{NR}} =i\psi^*\dot\psi-\frac{1}{2m}\nabla\psi^*\cdot\nabla\psi.

Exercise 4: dimension of the quartic coupling

Section titled “Exercise 4: dimension of the quartic coupling”

In dd spacetime dimensions, determine the mass dimension of a real scalar field and of the coupling λ\lambda in

Lint=−λ4!ϕ4.\mathcal L_{\mathrm{int}}=-\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4.

For which dd is λ\lambda dimensionless?

Solution

The action is dimensionless, so L\mathcal L has mass dimension dd. The kinetic term has dimension

[∂μϕ∂μϕ]=2+2[ϕ].[\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi]=2+2[\phi].

Thus

2+2[ϕ]=d,2+2[\phi]=d,

so

[ϕ]=d−22.[\phi]=\frac{d-2}{2}.

The interaction term has dimension

[λ]+4[ϕ]=d.[\lambda]+4[\phi]=d.

Therefore

[λ]=d−4(d−22)=4−d.[\lambda]=d-4\left(\frac{d-2}{2}\right)=4-d.

The quartic coupling is dimensionless in

d=4.d=4.

This is why ϕ4\phi^4 theory in four spacetime dimensions is the standard marginal scalar interaction by power counting.

  • Mark Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, Sections 3 and 22, for canonical scalar fields and continuous symmetries.
  • Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I, Chapters 5 and 7, for scalar fields, antiparticles, and the canonical formalism.
  • Sidney Coleman, Lectures of Sidney Coleman on Quantum Field Theory, Chapters 3 and 6, for scalar fields and internal symmetries.
  • A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, Chapters I.4, I.8, and III.5, for physical motivation, canonical quantization, and nonrelativistic field theory.

Original QFT.org content:CC BY 4.0, unless an item supplies different terms. Third-party material retains its own terms.