Skip to content

Collision Kernels, Conservation, and Detailed Balance

A collision kernel is correct only as a complete reaction set: invariant measures, matrix-element normalization, identical-particle factors, quantum statistics, inverse reactions, medium-modified kinematics, and soft resummations must be mutually consistent. Conservation follows from reaction-level invariants, not from the appearance of an energy delta function in one species equation.

Required background. Use distribution functions, Lorentz-invariant phase space, and cross sections and decay rates.

Helpful background. The kinetic H-theorem uses microreversibility and positivity of these kernels.

Let dΠi=d3pi/[(2π)32Ei]d\Pi_i=d^3\mathbf p_i/[(2\pi)^32E_i] and ηi=+1\eta_i=+1 for bosons, 1-1 for fermions. For 1+23+41+2\leftrightarrow3+4,

C1[f]=12E1Si=24d3pi(2π)32Ei(2π)4δ4(p1+p2p3p4)M2×[f3f4(1+η1f1)(1+η2f2)f1f2(1+η3f3)(1+η4f4)].\begin{aligned} C_1[f]={}&\frac{1}{2E_1S} \int\prod_{i=2}^{4}\frac{d^3\mathbf p_i}{(2\pi)^32E_i}\, (2\pi)^4\delta^4(p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4)|\mathcal M|^2\\ &\times\left[ f_3f_4(1+\eta_1f_1)(1+\eta_2f_2) -f_1f_2(1+\eta_3f_3)(1+\eta_4f_4) \right]. \end{aligned}

SS divides identical initial or final configurations according to the matrix-element convention. Degeneracy averages must likewise match the definition of M2|\mathcal M|^2. A kernel imported from a cross section with initial-state averages cannot be multiplied by the same degeneracies again.

For 12+31\leftrightarrow2+3, the collision term contains

(2π)4δ4(p1p2p3)M1232[f2f3(1+η1f1)f1(1+η2f2)(1+η3f3)],(2\pi)^4\delta^4(p_1-p_2-p_3)|\mathcal M_{1\to23}|^2 \left[f_2f_3(1+\eta_1f_1) -f_1(1+\eta_2f_2)(1+\eta_3f_3)\right],

with the appropriate measures and symmetry factor. Medium dispersion can open or close this channel; unstable species and finite widths may require an off-shell treatment to avoid double counting a resonant 222\leftrightarrow2 contribution.

For charges qa,iq_{a,i} satisfying qa,1+qa,2=qa,3+qa,4q_{a,1}+q_{a,2}=q_{a,3}+q_{a,4}, sum the charge moment over every species and relabel integration variables between gain and loss. The common integrand is multiplied by

qa,1+qa,2qa,3qa,4=0.q_{a,1}+q_{a,2}-q_{a,3}-q_{a,4}=0.

The energy–momentum moment vanishes by the same argument with qipiμq_i\to p_i^\mu and the four-momentum delta function. A 121\leftrightarrow2 reaction conserves only charge combinations with q1=q2+q3q_1=q_2+q_3; individual particle numbers need not survive.

Numerically, conservation requires the discrete gain and loss terms to share quadrature nodes and weights or to be projected onto the exact invariant subspace. Post-step “correction” can hide a kernel inconsistency and may violate positivity.

Equilibrium distributions are

fieq=1eβ(upiμaqa,i)ηi,1+ηifieq=eβ(upiμaqa,i)fieq.f_i^{\mathrm{eq}} =\frac{1}{e^{\beta(u\cdot p_i-\mu_aq_{a,i})}-\eta_i}, \qquad 1+\eta_if_i^{\mathrm{eq}} =e^{\beta(u\cdot p_i-\mu_aq_{a,i})}f_i^{\mathrm{eq}}.

Energy–momentum and charge conservation make the exponential factors equal across each reaction, so gain equals loss pointwise. This proof also shows that chemical potentials are allowed only for charges conserved by the full reaction network. Stationarity of one incomplete subset does not establish equilibrium.

Microreversibility relates forward and inverse matrix elements after reversing momenta, spins, and external fields correctly. In a magnetic field or CP-violating background, the reversed process may belong to the time-reversed system rather than the same fixed external parameters.

The collision box in the hierarchy carries three obligations, not one label: derive or specify the kernel, prove its reaction invariants, and establish detailed balance in the equilibrium family. Only then can the next box support an H theorem or a trustworthy relaxation spectrum.

Flow from a Wigner correlator with its state and gauge link through shell projection, a controlled quasiparticle shell, and microscopic matching to a collision kernel, with cuts only when controlled; conservation and balance precede H-theorem or relaxation-mode tests and a retained-error closure, while leading coherence branches to matrix-valued transport.

In a weakly coupled quasiparticle regime, appropriately resummed cuts can generate a collision kernel. Conservation follows only if every channel, measure, symmetry factor, and mean-field exchange is treated consistently; detailed balance additionally uses the equilibrium weights and microreversibility. Soft, collinear, or resonant physics may require a different effective kernel rather than the displayed 222\leftrightarrow2 truncation. The diagram is schematic and not to scale.

The sections Relativistic 2↔2 kernel, Conservation by reaction invariants, and Detailed balance give the text and equation equivalent of the collision box.

Massless exchange produces soft divergences that require screening and matching. Nearly collinear splitting can overlap with repeated soft scattering, requiring the LPM integral equations in Arnold, Moore, and Yaffe 2003, §§ 2–3. Real intermediate states can be counted both as sequential decays and as resonant scattering unless a subtraction scheme is specified. These are leading-order consistency issues in many gauge plasmas.

The shared stochastic and kinetic closure table records collision invariants, regulator, closure order, positivity, and convergence obligations.

  • Verify dimensions and recover a known vacuum decay rate or cross section in the dilute limit.
  • Enumerate identical-particle factors and internal-state averages.
  • Include every inverse reaction and the correct Bose/Pauli factors.
  • Prove conserved moments analytically, then demand discrete conservation.
  • Test equilibrium pointwise, not only after integration.
  • Vary screening, resonant subtraction, and soft/collinear matching scales.

Use 1+ηf=eβ(Eμq)f1+\eta f=e^{\beta(E-\mu q)}f to show that the 222\leftrightarrow2 bracket vanishes in equilibrium.

Solution

The gain term equals f1f2f3f4exp[β(E1+E2μ(q1+q2))]f_1f_2f_3f_4\exp[\beta(E_1+E_2-\mu(q_1+q_2))], while the loss term has the exponential with E3+E4E_3+E_4 and q3+q4q_3+q_4. Reaction-level conservation makes the exponents identical.

Use this kernel to prove the H-theorem, derive moment closures, and analyze its linearized spectrum.

  • Arnold, P., Moore, G. D., and Yaffe, L. G. (2003). “Effective Kinetic Theory for High Temperature Gauge Theories.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2003(01), 030. arXiv:hep-ph/0209353; DOI.
  • de Groot, S. R., van Leeuwen, W. A., and van Weert, C. G. (1980). Relativistic Kinetic Theory: Principles and Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland. WorldCat record.