Coherent-State Path Integrals for Many-Body Systems
A normal-ordered Hamiltonian becomes a coherent-state path integral by inserting resolutions of identity at finite time step. The discrete kernel fixes which field is evaluated on each side of a time link, the endpoint terms, and the bosonic or fermionic thermal boundary condition. Only after those data are fixed is the familiar continuum action legitimate shorthand.
Required background. Second-Quantized Bosons and Fermions fixes the operator algebra; Regulated Bosonic Field Integrals supplies finite-dimensional measures; Grassmann Functional Integrals for Free Fermions supplies Grassmann Gaussian integration.
Helpful background. Thermal Density Operators and the KMS Condition explains the thermal trace, and Retarded, Advanced, and Keldysh Bases is the continuation route for real-time contours.
Coherent states and the finite-time kernel
Section titled “Coherent states and the finite-time kernel”For one bosonic mode, satisfies and
Fermionic coherent states use Grassmann numbers and the Berezin resolution of identity. Their eigenvalue property is analogous, but moving Grassmann variables past one another carries signs.
For the grand-canonical operator and , insert an identity between the factors of . If is normal ordered, then to first order
The unequal labels and are the ordering prescription. Replacing both immediately by a single erases information that can produce finite counterterms for nonlinear Hamiltonians Wilson and Galitski 2011, pp. 110401-1–110401-4.
After combining overlaps, a convenient discrete bosonic action is
with for the trace. Equivalent discretizations redistribute overlap terms and measures; they must agree before the continuum limit.
Bosonic and fermionic boundary conditions
Section titled “Bosonic and fermionic boundary conditions”For many modes, replace labels by fields and sums by regulated spatial integrals. Thermal bosons are periodic,
while thermal fermions are antiperiodic,
The minus sign follows from closing the Grassmann coherent-state trace, not from a convention chosen after Fourier transformation. It produces Matsubara frequencies for bosons and for fermions.
With the discrete definition understood, the continuum Euclidean notation is
For fermions, is an independent Grassmann variable conventionally written ; it is not complex conjugation inside the integration algebra. For real-time evolution the Berry term acquires the corresponding factor of , the contour and initial density matrix must be stated, and Euclidean antiperiodicity alone does not define an in–in functional.
Exact single-mode checks
Section titled “Exact single-mode checks”Take with . The discrete Gaussian determinant gives
for a boson, and
for a fermion. These equal the operator traces exactly. The bosonic convergence condition is physical: when for an isolated unbounded oscillator, the grand-canonical sum does not converge.
The occupation follows from :
This simple fixture simultaneously tests the sign of , the temporal boundary condition, the determinant power, and normalization. A continuum formula that fails it is not repaired by taking more time slices.
Interactions and normal symbols
Section titled “Interactions and normal symbols”For a normal-ordered bosonic interaction
the discrete normal symbol is . It is not until the continuum identification has been justified. Moreover,
not . A naive classical replacement can therefore generate an ordering error even as a formal time derivative looks correct.
For spatial fields, contact products require a spatial regulator in addition to the temporal one. Time slicing controls operator ordering; it does not renormalize ultraviolet spatial loops. These are independent limits.
Sources and observables
Section titled “Sources and observables”Add sources on the same time links as the operators they represent. A density source coupled to uses . Differentiating before taking the continuum limit fixes equal-time contact terms. If sources are introduced only after writing a smooth continuum action, those terms can be missed and Ward identities may fail.
The safe workflow is therefore:
- normal order the operator Hamiltonian relative to a declared reference;
- construct the finite- coherent-state kernel;
- impose endpoint or thermal boundary data;
- add sources with their operator ordering;
- verify a finite system or free determinant; and
- only then take continuum notation and the temporal limit.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”Dropping the one-step offset. records normal ordering. Setting the labels equal before checking the discrete integral can shift nonlinear actions.
Using periodic Grassmann fields. A fermionic thermal trace is antiperiodic. Periodic Grassmann boundary conditions compute a different graded object.
Letting time slicing stand in for spatial renormalization. The temporal prescription fixes ordering; a contact interaction still needs spatial regularization and matching.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Recover the fermionic determinant
Section titled “Recover the fermionic determinant”Discretize one fermionic level and show that antiperiodicity gives .
Solution
The discrete bilinear matrix represents one-step transport by and an antiperiodic closure. Its determinant is . A periodic closure would give and fail the operator trace.
Locate an ordering error
Section titled “Locate an ordering error”Compare the spectra obtained from and the incorrectly ordered .
Solution
On , the exact energies are , whereas . Their difference is , an one-body shift. It does not vanish with the temporal step and must be corrected at the operator-symbol stage.
Continue
Section titled “Continue”Hubbard–Stratonovich Fields and Collective Channels uses these regulated measures to decouple interactions. Densities, Currents, and Nonrelativistic Ward Identities differentiates source-coupled functionals. Quantum-Matter Correlators and Observable Conventions translates the resulting Euclidean correlators to real-time observables.
References
Section titled “References”- Wilson, Justin H., and Victor Galitski. “Breakdown of the Coherent State Path Integral: Two Simple Examples.” Physical Review Letters 106 (2011): 110401. DOI. Open PDF.