Skip to content

Dyson Equations and Self-Energies

The exact self-energy is defined by Dyson’s equation, G1=G01ΣG^{-1}=G_0^{-1}-\Sigma. It collects one-particle-irreducible insertions relative to a declared reference propagator. Its real part shifts dispersions, its imaginary part contributes damping, and its frequency derivative changes pole residue; none of these pieces alone fixes the incoherent spectral background or guarantees a conserving approximation. The underlying irreducible-insertion reorganization is given in Dyson 1949, pp. 491–494.

Required background. Quantum-Matter Correlators and Observable Conventions fixes the retarded convention. The Generating Functional and Connected Correlators and Cumulants supply the diagrammatic definition.

Helpful background. Lehmann Representations and Spectral Functions in Matter supplies exact positivity and normalization checks.

In operator or matrix notation,

G=G0+G0ΣG,G1=G01Σ.G=G_0+G_0\Sigma G, \qquad G^{-1}=G_0^{-1}-\Sigma.

The split is not unique: changing G0G_0 moves one-body terms between reference and self-energy. Physical poles and observables are unchanged only when the transformation is carried through consistently.

For a translationally invariant normal state,

GR(k,ω)=1ωξkΣR(k,ω),ξk=εkμ.G^R(\mathbf k,\omega) =\frac1{\omega-\xi_{\mathbf k}-\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,\omega)}, \qquad \xi_{\mathbf k}=\varepsilon_{\mathbf k}-\mu.

Causality makes ΣR\Sigma^R analytic in the upper half-plane. For a stable diagonal fermion channel, ImΣR0\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R\le0 on the real axis. A sign violation may indicate an inconsistent continuation or an approximation that has lost spectral positivity.

In an orbital, spin, or Nambu basis, all quantities are matrices and poles follow

det[G01(k,z)Σ(k,z)]=0.\det[G_0^{-1}(\mathbf k,z)-\Sigma(\mathbf k,z)]=0.

Matrix residues are projectors or weight matrices, not a single scalar ZZ.

Suppose an isolated narrow normal-state pole exists near real energy EkE_{\mathbf k}. Define it by

EkξkReΣR(k,Ek)=0.E_{\mathbf k}-\xi_{\mathbf k} -\operatorname{Re}\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,E_{\mathbf k})=0.

Expanding the denominator gives

Zk=[1ωReΣR(k,ω)Ek]1,γk=ZkImΣR(k,Ek).Z_{\mathbf k} =\left[ 1-\partial_\omega\operatorname{Re}\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,\omega) \big|_{E_{\mathbf k}} \right]^{-1}, \qquad \gamma_{\mathbf k} =-Z_{\mathbf k}\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,E_{\mathbf k}).

Then

GRZkωEk+iγk+GincR.G^R\simeq\frac{Z_{\mathbf k}} {\omega-E_{\mathbf k}+i\gamma_{\mathbf k}} +G^R_{\rm inc}.

The Lorentzian full width at half maximum is 2γk2\gamma_{\mathbf k}. The retarded amplitude decays as eγte^{-\gamma t}; conventions that call 2γ2\gamma the decay rate must be translated explicitly. The pole carries weight ZZ, while GincG_{\rm inc} carries the rest required by the spectral sum rule.

The group velocity is

vk=Zk[kξk+kReΣR]ω=Ek.\mathbf v^*_{\mathbf k} =Z_{\mathbf k} \left[\boldsymbol\nabla_{\mathbf k}\xi_{\mathbf k} +\boldsymbol\nabla_{\mathbf k}\operatorname{Re}\Sigma^R \right]_{\omega=E_{\mathbf k}}.

Thus residue and effective mass are distinct: momentum dependence of Σ\Sigma contributes to velocity even when ZZ is known.

The spectral function is

A(k,ω)=2ImΣR[ωξkReΣR]2+[ImΣR]2,A(\mathbf k,\omega) =\frac{-2\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R} {[\omega-\xi_{\mathbf k}-\operatorname{Re}\Sigma^R]^2 +[\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R]^2},

when no additional infinitesimal or matrix structure is relevant. A narrow maximum can arise without an isolated pole if a branch edge or rapidly varying numerator is present. The pole must be found in the complex plane or by a controlled narrow-width expansion.

Kramers–Kronig relations connect real and imaginary parts. Adding a constant imaginary width over all frequencies produces a logarithmically ill-behaved real part unless ultraviolet behavior is supplied. Any phenomenological self-energy should therefore state its frequency window and completion.

At large frequency, G(z)1/zG(z)\sim1/z. If an approximate self-energy changes this coefficient, it violates canonical normalization. Higher inverse powers are checked against spectral moments.

Given a measured or computed GG and a chosen G0G_0,

Σ=G01G1.\Sigma=G_0^{-1}-G^{-1}.

This inversion amplifies noise near zeros of GG and inherits uncertainty in band structure, chemical potential, matrix elements, and analytic continuation. A fitted Σ\Sigma is model dependent unless these inputs and their covariance are propagated.

In broken-symmetry Nambu space, normal and anomalous self-energies depend on spinor convention and gauge. Observable poles are invariant after the entire matrix and source vertices are transformed; an anomalous component by itself is not a measured condensate.

Calling ReΣ\operatorname{Re}\Sigma the dispersion. The pole solves an implicit equation and includes the reference dispersion. Its derivative also enters ZZ and velocity.

Equating ZZ with effective mass. They coincide only under additional assumptions such as a momentum-independent self-energy in a simple band.

Inferring conservation from Dyson self-consistency. A self-consistent GG still needs a compatible response vertex. Conservation is tested at the two-particle level.

Let ΣR(ω)=Σ0+(1Z01)ωiΓ0\Sigma^R(\omega)=\Sigma_0+(1-Z_0^{-1})\omega-i\Gamma_0. Find the pole and damping.

Solution

The denominator is Z01ωξΣ0+iΓ0Z_0^{-1}\omega-\xi-\Sigma_0+i\Gamma_0. Hence

E=Z0(ξ+Σ0),γ=Z0Γ0,E=Z_0(\xi+\Sigma_0), \qquad \gamma=Z_0\Gamma_0,

and the pole residue is Z0Z_0. Positivity requires Γ00\Gamma_0\ge0 in this convention.

For Σ(k,ω)=aω+bk2/(2m)\Sigma(\mathbf k,\omega)=a\omega+b\mathbf k^2/(2m) near a parabolic band, find ZZ and mm^*.

Solution

Z=(1a)1Z=(1-a)^{-1}. The pole dispersion is Ek=Z(1+b)k2/(2m)E_{\mathbf k}=Z(1+b)\mathbf k^2/(2m) up to constants, so m=m/[Z(1+b)]m^*=m/[Z(1+b)]. Knowledge of ZZ alone does not determine mm^* when b0b\ne0.

Quasiparticle Poles, Residues, and Lifetimes supplies the interpretation threshold. Current Vertices and Ward-Consistent Response constructs the compatible vertex. Luttinger–Ward Functionals and Φ-Derivable Self-Energies gives one systematic route to self-consistent Σ\Sigma.

  • Dyson, Freeman J. “The Radiation Theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman.” Physical Review 75 (1949): 486–502. DOI.
  • Fetter, Alexander L., and John Dirk Walecka. Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2003; originally published 1971. Publisher record.
  • Mahan, Gerald D. Many-Particle Physics. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2000. DOI.