Skip to content

Quantum-Matter Correlators and Observable Conventions

Different many-body correlators answer different questions even when they contain the same two operators. Time ordering organizes perturbation theory, retarded ordering gives causal response, lesser and greater functions carry occupation and availability, the Matsubara function lives on discrete imaginary frequencies, and the spectral function supplies the common analytic data from which equilibrium translations are made. The equilibrium dictionary and its analytic continuation are developed in Mahan 2000, ch. 3.

Required background. Coherent-State Path Integrals for Many-Body Systems supplies the Euclidean functional; Thermal Density Operators and the KMS Condition, Imaginary Time and Matsubara Frequencies, and Retarded, Advanced, and Spectral Correlators supply the universal analytic framework.

Helpful background. Retarded, Advanced, and Keldysh Bases extends the dictionary away from equilibrium.

For a fermionic annihilation operator ψ(1)=ψ(t1,x1)\psi(1)=\psi(t_1,\mathbf x_1) in an equilibrium state, choose

G>(1,2)=iψ(1)ψ(2),G<(1,2)=+iψ(2)ψ(1),GR(1,2)=iθ(t1t2){ψ(1),ψ(2)},GA(1,2)=+iθ(t2t1){ψ(1),ψ(2)}.\begin{aligned} G^>(1,2)&=-i\langle\psi(1)\psi^\dagger(2)\rangle,\\ G^<(1,2)&=+i\langle\psi^\dagger(2)\psi(1)\rangle,\\ G^R(1,2)&=-i\theta(t_1-t_2) \langle\{\psi(1),\psi^\dagger(2)\}\rangle,\\ G^A(1,2)&=+i\theta(t_2-t_1) \langle\{\psi(1),\psi^\dagger(2)\}\rangle. \end{aligned}

The time-ordered function is

GT(1,2)=θ(t1t2)G>(1,2)+θ(t2t1)G<(1,2).G^T(1,2)=\theta(t_1-t_2)G^>(1,2) +\theta(t_2-t_1)G^<(1,2).

For bosonic single-particle fields, replace the anticommutator in GR,AG^{R,A} by a commutator and adjust the sign convention for G<G^<. Rather than memorize a mixed-statistics table, define every function from its operator ordering before using a thermal identity.

For a stationary homogeneous state, Fourier transform differences and define

A(k,ω)=i[G>(k,ω)G<(k,ω)]=2ImGR(k,ω).A(\mathbf k,\omega) =i[G^>(\mathbf k,\omega)-G^<(\mathbf k,\omega)] =-2\operatorname{Im}G^R(\mathbf k,\omega).

With canonical fermion normalization,

dω2πA(k,ω)=1.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\mathrm d\omega}{2\pi} A(\mathbf k,\omega)=1.

This convention makes A0A\ge0 in the canonical diagonal single-particle channel. Matrix-valued spectral functions are positive semidefinite, while arbitrary composite-operator commutator spectra need not be positive at every frequency.

For fermions in equilibrium,

G<(k,ω)=if(ω)A(k,ω),G>(k,ω)=i[1f(ω)]A(k,ω),G^<(\mathbf k,\omega)=if(\omega)A(\mathbf k,\omega), \qquad G^>(\mathbf k,\omega)=-i[1-f(\omega)]A(\mathbf k,\omega),

where f(ω)=1/(eβω+1)f(\omega)=1/(e^{\beta\omega}+1) when ω\omega is measured relative to the chemical potential. Hence

nk=ckck=dω2πf(ω)A(k,ω).n_{\mathbf k}=\langle c_{\mathbf k}^\dagger c_{\mathbf k}\rangle =\int\frac{\mathrm d\omega}{2\pi}f(\omega)A(\mathbf k,\omega).

If frequency is measured from the vacuum Hamiltonian instead, the thermal factor is f(ωμ)f(\omega-\mu). This translation is a frequent source of apparent disagreement.

The retarded function follows from the spectral representation

GR(k,z)=dω2πA(k,ω)zω,Imz>0.G^R(\mathbf k,z)= \int\frac{\mathrm d\omega'}{2\pi} \frac{A(\mathbf k,\omega')}{z-\omega'}, \qquad \operatorname{Im}z>0.

Causality makes it analytic in the upper half-plane; poles of a stable retarded propagator lie on or below the real axis after continuation.

The fermionic imaginary-time function is

G(τ,k)=Tτck(τ)ck(0),G(τ+β)=G(τ).G(\tau,\mathbf k) =-\langle\mathrm T_\tau c_{\mathbf k}(\tau)c_{\mathbf k}^\dagger(0)\rangle, \qquad G(\tau+\beta)=-G(\tau).

At ωn=(2n+1)πT\omega_n=(2n+1)\pi T,

G(iωn,k)=dω2πA(k,ω)iωnω.G(i\omega_n,\mathbf k) =\int\frac{\mathrm d\omega'}{2\pi} \frac{A(\mathbf k,\omega')}{i\omega_n-\omega'}.

If the exact analytic function is known, iωnω+i0i\omega_n\to\omega+i0 yields GRG^R. Reconstructing that function from finitely many noisy Matsubara data is an ill-posed inverse problem, not a mechanical substitution.

For a Hermitian density nqn_{\mathbf q},

χnnR(t,q)=iθ(t)[nq(t),nq(0)].\chi^R_{nn}(t,\mathbf q) =-i\theta(t)\langle[n_{\mathbf q}(t),n_{-\mathbf q}(0)]\rangle.

The dynamic structure factor

S(q,ω)=1ZmneβKmnnqm22πδ(ωKn+Km)S(\mathbf q,\omega) =\frac1Z\sum_{mn}e^{-\beta K_m} |\langle n|n_{\mathbf q}|m\rangle|^2 2\pi\delta(\omega-K_n+K_m)

is nonnegative. The fluctuation–dissipation relation in this normalization is

2ImχnnR(q,ω)=[1eβω]S(q,ω).-2\operatorname{Im}\chi^R_{nn}(\mathbf q,\omega) =[1-e^{-\beta\omega}]S(\mathbf q,\omega).

Thus the response spectral density changes sign with ω\omega, while SS does not. Confusing these two objects can produce a false positivity violation.

  • Use GTG^T or Matsubara GG to organize equilibrium perturbation theory.
  • Use GRG^R for causal propagation, poles, widths, and linear response.
  • Use G<G^< for occupied spectral weight and G>G^> for available addition weight.
  • Use AA to translate among equilibrium one-particle functions.
  • Use a composite-operator retarded susceptibility for a measured response, including its matrix element and contact terms.

No correlator is “the Green function” without its ordering, state, source convention, and frequency origin.

For K=ξccK=\xi c^\dagger c, compute A(ω)A(\omega), G<(ω)G^<(\omega), and nn.

Solution

The retarded propagator is GR(ω)=1/(ωξ+i0)G^R(\omega)=1/(\omega-\xi+i0), so A(ω)=2πδ(ωξ)A(\omega)=2\pi\delta(\omega-\xi). Then G<(ω)=2πif(ξ)δ(ωξ)G^<(\omega)=2\pi i f(\xi)\delta(\omega-\xi) and n=fA/(2π)=f(ξ)n=\int fA/(2\pi)=f(\xi).

Use the Lehmann sum for a Hermitian density to show S(q,ω)=eβωS(q,ω)S(\mathbf q,-\omega)=e^{-\beta\omega}S(-\mathbf q,\omega).

Solution

Exchange mnm\leftrightarrow n in the negative-frequency sum. The delta function imposes KnKm=ωK_n-K_m=\omega, so eβKn=eβωeβKme^{-\beta K_n}=e^{-\beta\omega}e^{-\beta K_m}. Hermiticity relates the two matrix elements, giving the stated result.

Lehmann Representations and Spectral Functions in Matter derives the dictionary from exact states. Dyson Equations and Self-Energies reorganizes the retarded function. From Measured Intensity to Many-Body Claim adds probe matrix elements and resolution.

  • Mahan, Gerald D. Many-Particle Physics. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2000. DOI.
  • Fetter, Alexander L., and John Dirk Walecka. Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2003; originally published 1971. Publisher record.
  • Kubo, Ryogo. “Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes. I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems.” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 12 (1957): 570–586. DOI.