Skip to content

Coulomb Screening, Dielectric Response, and RPA Validity

Screening is the self-consistent rearrangement of charge induced by a perturbing potential. The random-phase approximation (RPA) is the geometric resummation of polarization bubbles that produces this rearrangement. It is exact for a specified noninteracting polarization inside that diagram class, but its accuracy for an interacting material depends on density, dimensionality, degeneracy, and the observable. Its controlled high-density correlation-energy use is demonstrated in Gell-Mann and Brueckner 1957, pp. 364–367.

Required background. Polarization, the Lindhard Function, and Particle–Hole Continua fixes the sign and normalization of Π0\Pi_0.

Helpful background. Sources, Linear Response, and Kubo Formulae supplies the response and analytic-continuation framework.

Self-consistent potential and dielectric function

Section titled “Self-consistent potential and dielectric function”

Let UextU_{\rm ext} couple to number density and let vq>0v_q>0 be the repulsive interaction. In the convention δn=Π0Utot\delta n=\Pi_0U_{\rm tot}, the induced Hartree potential is vqδnv_q\delta n. Therefore

Utot=Uext+vqΠ0Utot,Utot=Uext1vqΠ0.U_{\rm tot}=U_{\rm ext}+v_q\Pi_0U_{\rm tot}, \qquad U_{\rm tot}=\frac{U_{\rm ext}}{1-v_q\Pi_0}.

The RPA dielectric function, density response, and screened interaction are consequently

ϵRPA(q,ω)=1vqΠ0R(q,ω),\epsilon_{\rm RPA}(q,\omega)=1-v_q\Pi_0^R(q,\omega), χRPAR=Π0R1vqΠ0R,WRPAR=vq1vqΠ0R.\chi_{\rm RPA}^R=\frac{\Pi_0^R}{1-v_q\Pi_0^R}, \qquad W_{\mathrm{RPA}}^R=\frac{v_q}{1-v_q\Pi_0^R}.

Diagrammatically, W=v+vΠ0v+vΠ0vΠ0v+W=v+v\Pi_0v+v\Pi_0v\Pi_0v+\cdots. This identity also fixes every sign: in the static limit Π0<0\Pi_0<0, so repulsion makes the denominator larger than one and reduces the long-range potential.

Thomas–Fermi screening in three dimensions

Section titled “Thomas–Fermi screening in three dimensions”

For Coulomb interactions in a background dielectric medium,

vq=4πe2ϵbq2.v_q=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\epsilon_bq^2}.

At T=0T=0 and qkFq\ll k_F, Π0(q,0)=νF+O(q2)\Pi_0(q,0)=-\nu_F+O(q^2). Hence

ϵRPA(q,0)=1+kTF2q2,kTF2=4πe2νFϵb,\epsilon_{\mathrm{RPA}}(q,0)=1+\frac{k_{\mathrm{TF}}^2}{q^2}, \qquad k_{\mathrm{TF}}^2=\frac{4\pi e^2\nu_F}{\epsilon_b},

and

WRPA(q,0)=4πe2ϵb(q2+kTF2).W_{\mathrm{RPA}}(q,0)=\frac{4\pi e^2}{\epsilon_b(q^2+k_{\mathrm{TF}}^2)}.

Fourier transformation gives a Yukawa potential W(r)=e2ekTFr/(ϵbr)W(r)=e^2e^{-k_{\mathrm{TF}}r}/(\epsilon_b r). The approximation captures the long-wavelength screening length; keeping the full Lindhard function also produces the 2kF2k_F nonanalyticity and Friedel tail, which a constant Π0\Pi_0 misses.

RPA sums direct ring diagrams built from bare or otherwise declared propagators and bare density vertices. It omits exchange diagrams, vertex corrections, and local-field factors. If dressed propagators are inserted without changing the vertex, conservation identities can be lost.

Controlled regimes include the high-density electron gas for leading correlation-energy logarithms, large flavor degeneracy with an appropriate interaction scaling, and long wavelengths where the Coulomb singularity enhances direct density fluctuations. These are regime statements, not a uniform error bound for every qq, ω\omega, or observable. Short-range correlations, low density, and proximity to an instability generally require corrections.

For a neutral system, the q=0q=0 Coulomb component is removed or cancelled by the uniform positive background. Failing to state that prescription creates a spurious divergent Hartree energy.

Retarded screening uses Π0R(q,z)\Pi_0^R(q,z) analytic for Imz>0\operatorname{Im}z>0. The energy-loss function

L(q,ω)=Imϵ1(q,ω)\mathcal L(q,\omega)=-\operatorname{Im}\epsilon^{-1}(q,\omega)

can contain both a collective pole and particle–hole background. A peak in L\mathcal L is not by itself proof of an isolated pole: one must continue the inverse response and distinguish a zero of ϵ\epsilon from a maximum created by a continuum edge.

Using 1+vqΠ01+v_q\Pi_0 with a negative static polarization. That convention would antiscreen. Derive the denominator from the declared coupling rather than memorizing a sign.

Calling RPA generically controlled. Its leading terms are controlled only in specified limits. A small interaction parameter for one quantity need not control spectra near a continuum threshold.

Mixing background and vacuum Coulomb conventions. State whether ϵb\epsilon_b and the neutralizing background have already been included in vqv_q.

Starting from W=v+vΠ0v+W=v+v\Pi_0v+\cdots, derive the screened interaction for commuting scalar functions.

Solution

Factor out vv and recognize a geometric series: W=vn=0(Π0v)n=v/(1vΠ0)W=v\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(\Pi_0v)^n=v/(1-v\Pi_0) when the series converges. The retarded expression elsewhere follows by analytic continuation of this identity.

A positive static test potential is applied to an electron gas. Explain why W<vW<v at small momentum.

Solution

The perturbation depletes number density, so Π0(q,0)<0\Pi_0(q,0)<0. Thus 1vqΠ0=1+vqΠ0>11-v_q\Pi_0=1+v_q|\Pi_0|>1, and the total potential WW is smaller than the bare potential. The induced charge opposes the test charge.

Plasmons and Collective Charge Modes finds zeros of the dielectric function. Hedin Equations, Screened Interactions, and GW promotes WW to a self-consistent many-body object. Baym–Kadanoff Conservation and Validity separates conservation from quantitative accuracy.

  • Gell-Mann, Murray, and Keith A. Brueckner. “Correlation Energy of an Electron Gas at High Density.” Physical Review 106 (1957): 364–368. DOI.
  • Bohm, David, and David Pines. “A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: III. Coulomb Interactions in a Degenerate Electron Gas.” Physical Review 92 (1953): 609–625. DOI.
  • Giuliani, Gabriele F., and Giovanni Vignale. Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI.
  • Pines, David, and Philippe Nozières. The Theory of Quantum Liquids, Volume I: Normal Fermi Liquids. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2018; originally published 1966. Publisher record.