Skip to content

Quasiparticle Poles, Residues, and Lifetimes

A spectral peak defines a quasiparticle only when it is controlled by an isolated retarded pole with finite residue and a width small compared with the energy scale on which its dispersion and environment change. Residue, effective mass, spectral damping, occupation decay, and transport relaxation are different quantities. A broad maximum or threshold cusp is not promoted to a particle by fitting it with a Lorentzian. The original long-lived-excitation and interaction-function construction is given in Landau 1957, pp. 920–923, Open PDF.

Required background. Lehmann Representations and Spectral Functions in Matter fixes exact spectral weight, and Dyson Equations and Self-Energies defines the pole and residue.

Helpful background. Spectral Functions and Transport Peaks distinguishes low-frequency transport structure, while Transport Extraction, Inverse Problems, and Error Budgets treats resolution and reconstruction errors.

For one diagonal normal-state channel,

GR(k,z)=1zξkΣR(k,z).G^R(\mathbf k,z)= \frac1{z-\xi_{\mathbf k}-\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,z)}.

A quasiparticle pole zk=Ekiγkz_{\mathbf k}=E_{\mathbf k}-i\gamma_{\mathbf k} solves the analytically continued denominator on the sheet connected to the retarded function. In the narrow-width approximation,

Zk=[1ωReΣR]Ek1,γk=ZkImΣR(k,Ek).Z_{\mathbf k}= \left[1-\partial_\omega\operatorname{Re}\Sigma^R \right]^{-1}_{E_{\mathbf k}}, \qquad \gamma_{\mathbf k}=-Z_{\mathbf k}\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R(\mathbf k,E_{\mathbf k}).

Near the pole,

A(k,ω)2Zkγk(ωEk)2+γk2+Ainc.A(\mathbf k,\omega) \simeq \frac{2Z_{\mathbf k}\gamma_{\mathbf k}} {(\omega-E_{\mathbf k})^2+\gamma_{\mathbf k}^2} +A_{\rm inc}.

The pole contribution integrates to ZkZ_{\mathbf k}; the incoherent part carries the remaining weight. A valid quasiparticle description requires at least

γkmin(Evariation,Eseparation),\gamma_{\mathbf k}\ll \min(E_{\rm variation},E_{\rm separation}),

where the comparison scales include distance to a continuum edge, neighboring pole separation, and variation scale of Σ\Sigma. Near a Fermi surface, the useful criterion is typically γ/E0\gamma/|E|\to0 as E0E\to0.

With denominator ωE+iγ\omega-E+i\gamma, the retarded amplitude decays as eγte^{-\gamma t} and the spectral full width at half maximum is 2γ2\gamma. A nonequilibrium occupation often decays at rate 2γ2\gamma in a simple weak-coupling kinetic limit. We therefore report the pole damping γ\gamma and state separately which time-domain quantity is called a lifetime.

Transport relaxation weights collisions by their efficiency in degrading a current. For elastic scattering through angle θ\theta,

1τspdΩW(θ),1τtrdΩW(θ)(1cosθ).\frac1{\tau_{\rm sp}}\propto \int\mathrm d\Omega\,W(\theta), \qquad \frac1{\tau_{\rm tr}}\propto \int\mathrm d\Omega\,W(\theta)(1-\cos\theta).

Forward scattering can strongly broaden a single-particle state while barely relaxing momentum. Vertex corrections encode this distinction; it cannot be read from ImΣ\operatorname{Im}\Sigma alone.

For a conventional three-dimensional Fermi liquid close to its Fermi surface,

ImΣR(kF,ω,T)ω2+π2T2-\operatorname{Im}\Sigma^R(\mathbf k_F,\omega,T) \propto \omega^2+\pi^2T^2

up to logarithmic or dimensional modifications. At T=0T=0, γ/ω0\gamma/|\omega|\to0, so excitations become sharper as the Fermi surface is approached. At fixed nonzero TT, the lowest-frequency width remains O(T2)O(T^2) and the order of limits matters.

A finite ZZ is useful but not sufficient: a pole can be too broad. Conversely, systems with vanishing ZZ can retain other sharp collective excitations, but those are not Landau quasiparticles in the original single-particle channel.

The pole velocity is

v=Z(kξ+kReΣ).\mathbf v^*= Z\left(\boldsymbol\nabla_{\mathbf k}\xi +\boldsymbol\nabla_{\mathbf k}\operatorname{Re}\Sigma\right).

Only when the self-energy is momentum independent does m/m=Z1m^*/m=Z^{-1} for a parabolic isotropic band. In a Galilean-invariant Fermi liquid, backflow and Landau parameters relate thermodynamic effective mass to current response; the relation is not the single-particle residue identity.

The zeroth spectral sum rule remains

Zk+dω2πAinc(k,ω)=1.Z_{\mathbf k} +\int\frac{\mathrm d\omega}{2\pi}A_{\rm inc}(\mathbf k,\omega)=1.

An approximation that places a pole of weight Z>1Z>1 in a positive diagonal spectrum must compensate with negative weight and therefore violates positivity.

  • A threshold singularity can make a sharp asymmetric edge without an isolated pole.
  • Two unresolved poles can look like one broad peak.
  • Instrumental convolution can create an apparent width.
  • A maximum of a matrix-element-weighted intensity can shift away from the maximum of AA.
  • In finite volume, artificial broadening of delta functions is not a lifetime.

The minimum check varies resolution or broadening, locates the complex pole or demonstrates a controlled narrow-width expansion, and verifies spectral normalization.

Equating peak width with transport lifetime. Transport contains angular and vertex weights. Report the response channel.

Equating ZZ with the coherent fraction of every observable. ZZ is the pole weight of a named field; other probes include vertices and matrix elements.

Accepting a real-axis maximum as a pole. Inspect analytic continuation and continuum thresholds.

If γ(E)=αE2/EF\gamma(E)=\alpha E^2/E_F at T=0T=0, find the condition for a sharp excitation.

Solution

The ratio is γ/E=αE/EF\gamma/|E|=\alpha|E|/E_F. It tends to zero as E0E\to0 and is small when EEF/α|E|\ll E_F/\alpha, provided no nearer continuum or competing pole supplies a smaller comparison scale.

For scattering confined to a narrow cone of angle θ01\theta_0\ll1, estimate τtr/τsp\tau_{\rm tr}/\tau_{\rm sp}.

Solution

Inside the cone, 1cosθθ2/2θ021-\cos\theta\simeq\theta^2/2\sim\theta_0^2. Thus τtr1θ02τsp1\tau_{\rm tr}^{-1}\sim\theta_0^2\tau_{\rm sp}^{-1} and τtr/τspθ021\tau_{\rm tr}/\tau_{\rm sp}\sim\theta_0^{-2}\gg1, up to angular-distribution factors.

Spectral Moments and Many-Body Sum Rules checks the full spectrum beyond the pole. Current Vertices and Ward-Consistent Response explains why transport needs a vertex. Microscopic Quasiparticles and Self-Energy applies these conditions at a Fermi surface.

  • Landau, Lev D. “The Theory of a Fermi Liquid.” Soviet Physics JETP 3 (1957): 920–925. Open PDF.
  • Nozières, Philippe. Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997; originally published 1964. DOI.
  • Pines, David, and Philippe Nozières. The Theory of Quantum Liquids, Volume I: Normal Fermi Liquids. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2018; originally published 1966. DOI.