Contact Witten Diagrams
A contact Witten diagram integrates one local bulk vertex against bulk-to-boundary propagators. It is a contribution to a boundary correlator in an AdS perturbation expansion. Its dependence on cross ratios probes the vertex and derivative order, but integration by parts, equation-of-motion terms, and local counterterms prevent a single diagram from defining a unique bulk Lagrangian.
Required background. AdS propagators supplies the normalized external legs.
Helpful background. Four-point cross ratios supplies the conformal kinematics. Predictive EFT power counting supplies the derivative expansion.
The local four-point vertex
Section titled “The local four-point vertex”For a canonically normalized scalar with interaction
four source derivatives of the tree-level on-shell action give
up to the declared Euclidean generating-functional sign. Conformal covariance factors the result into powers of times a function of and . The remaining integral is a -function Freedman et al. 1999.
Derivative vertices insert contractions of and yield higher-degree Mellin polynomials. Convergence requires an initial domain in the ; other values are defined by analytic continuation plus holographic counterterms. At large , the scaling of must match the normalization of before one quotes an OPE coefficient.
First application: the scalar φ⁴ diagram
Section titled “First application: the scalar φ⁴ diagram”For four identical scalars the integral is invariant under all permutations of the external points. After extracting , the reduced correlator obeys the corresponding crossing transformations of and . Its overall coefficient is linear in , with additional powers removed when the bulk field is canonically rescaled.
The OPE limit contains double-trace families . Logarithms at the perturbative order encode their anomalous dimensions; no new single-trace pole is implied by a pure contact vertex. This gives three independent checks: permutation symmetry, dimensional scaling, and the absence of an exchange pole family.
Adversarial control: incomplete integration by parts
Section titled “Adversarial control: incomplete integration by parts”Replace a derivative vertex by an integration-by-parts-equivalent expression but discard the boundary term. If the fields have nonvanishing source falloffs or the integral is regulated, that boundary contribution can be a local contact term. The two answers then appear to disagree even though the correctly transformed renormalized action is equivalent. The mismatch is exposed by a changed contact distribution or crossing coefficient.
The evidence ceiling is the coefficient of a perturbative AdS correlator in a stated field basis and scheme. It is not an S-matrix element, an all-orders result, or a unique microscopic interaction. Exchange diagrams add single-particle propagation while retaining contact freedom.
The chapter overview contains the structure diagram and validity and failure diagram. They are embedded there once so that their shared chapter-level context is not repeated on every article.
For the chapter-wide comparison of assumptions, counterevidence, falsifiers, and claim ceilings, see the claim-domain table.
References
Section titled “References”- D’Hoker, E., Freedman, D. Z., Mathur, S. D., Matusis, A., and Rastelli, L. (1999), “Graviton Exchange and Complete Four-Point Functions in the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” Nuclear Physics B 562, 353–394. arXiv:hep-th/9903196.
- Freedman, D. Z., Mathur, S. D., Matusis, A., and Rastelli, L. (1999), “Correlation Functions in the CFT/AdS Correspondence,” Nuclear Physics B 546, 96–118. arXiv:hep-th/9804058.
- Witten, E. (1998), “Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2, 253–291. arXiv:hep-th/9802150.