Skip to content

Kähler and Hyperkähler Quotients in Supersymmetric QFT

Supersymmetry equips many vacuum spaces with more than a complex structure. Four-dimensional N=1\mathcal N=1 Higgs branches arise locally as Kähler quotients, while eight-supercharge Higgs branches arise as hyperkähler quotients. The quotient equations determine the inherited geometry at the classical level; nonrenormalization requires a separate argument and depends on the number of supercharges and on which branch is studied.

Required background. F- and D-flatness supplies the vacuum equations, and moment maps supplies symplectic reduction. Helpful background. Kähler sigma models explains how the quotient metric becomes a low-energy kinetic term.

Let a compact group GG act holomorphically and isometrically on a Kähler manifold (X,g,J,ω)(X,g,J,\omega). For generators kak_a, a moment map satisfies

ιkaω=dμa.\iota_{k_a}\omega=d\mu_a.

At a regular central value ξ\xi, with GG acting freely and properly, the quotient

X/ ⁣/ξG=μ1(ξ)/GX/\!/_{\xi}G=\mu^{-1}(\xi)/G

is Kähler. Its tangent space at an orbit can be represented by vectors orthogonal to both the orbit directions kak_a and their complex partners JkaJk_a. Restricting gg to this horizontal subspace gives the quotient metric. The appearance of Kähler target geometry in four-supercharge sigma models is the result of Zumino 1979, pp. 203–206.

In an N=1\mathcal N=1 gauge theory, first restrict XX to the F-flat locus. When that locus is a smooth GCG_{\mathbb C}-invariant complex submanifold, the D equation and compact quotient produce its Kähler reduction. If the action has stabilizers or the level is not regular, the result is a stratified Kähler space rather than a smooth manifold.

A useful local calculation integrates out a massive vector multiplet in superspace. For chiral fields Φ\Phi with charges qiq_i and an abelian vector VV,

K(Φ,Φˉ,V)=iΦˉie2qiVΦi2ξV.K(\Phi,\bar\Phi,V) =\sum_i\bar\Phi_i e^{2q_iV}\Phi_i-2\xi V.

At energies below the vector mass and neglecting its derivative terms, K/V=0\partial K/\partial V=0 is precisely the moment-map equation. Substituting the solution V(Φ,Φˉ)V(\Phi,\bar\Phi) back into KK produces a Kähler potential for the quotient in a chosen patch. Different gauge choices change this potential by Kähler transformations while leaving the metric invariant.

For nn fields of charge +1+1 and ξ>0\xi>0, choose the complex gauge patch Φn0\Phi_n\neq0 and define wa=Φa/Φnw_a=\Phi_a/\Phi_n for a=1,,n1a=1,\ldots,n-1. Solving the vector equation and discarding a Kähler transformation gives

Kquot=ξlog ⁣(1+a=1n1wa2).K_{\mathrm{quot}}=\xi\log\!\left(1+\sum_{a=1}^{n-1}|w_a|^2\right).

Thus the quotient metric is the Fubini–Study metric on CPn1\mathbb{CP}^{n-1} with Kähler class proportional to ξ\xi:

gabˉ=ξ(1+w2)δabˉwˉawb(1+w2)2.g_{a\bar b} =\xi\frac{(1+|w|^2)\delta_{a\bar b}-\bar w_a w_b} {(1+|w|^2)^2}.

The coordinate patch fails where Φn=0\Phi_n=0, but the metric does not. On overlaps, the local Kähler potentials differ by F(w)+F(w)F(w)+\overline{F(w)}.

Three moment maps and hyperkähler reduction

Section titled “Three moment maps and hyperkähler reduction”

A hyperkähler manifold has a metric gg and complex structures I,J,KI,J,K obeying the quaternionic relations, with closed two-forms ωI,ωJ,ωK\omega_I,\omega_J,\omega_K. A tri-holomorphic GG action has three moment maps

dμAa=ιkaωA,A=I,J,K.d\mu_A^a=\iota_{k_a}\omega_A, \qquad A=I,J,K.

The hyperkähler quotient is

X/ ⁣/ ⁣/ξG=μ1(ξ)/G.X/\!/\!/_{\vec\xi}G =\vec\mu^{-1}(\vec\xi)/G.

The construction and its supersymmetric interpretation are due to Hitchin, Karlhede, Lindström, and Roček 1987, pp. 535–589.

At a regular value and for a free action, it removes 4dimG4\dim G real dimensions:

dimR(X/ ⁣/ ⁣/G)=dimRX4dimG.\dim_{\mathbb R}(X/\!/\!/G) =\dim_{\mathbb R}X-4\dim G.

In one chosen complex structure, combine two real equations into the complex moment map μC=μJ+iμK\mu_{\mathbb C}=\mu_J+i\mu_K and retain μR=μI\mu_{\mathbb R}=\mu_I. Then

X/ ⁣/ ⁣/GμC1(ξC)ss/GC,X/\!/\!/G \simeq \mu_{\mathbb C}^{-1}(\xi_{\mathbb C})^{\mathrm{ss}}/G_{\mathbb C},

with stability fixed by ξR\xi_{\mathbb R}. This form closely parallels F-flatness followed by a D-term quotient.

Worked example: cotangent bundles of projective space

Section titled “Worked example: cotangent bundles of projective space”

Take flat HnCn(Cn)\mathbb H^n\simeq\mathbb C^n\oplus(\mathbb C^n)^* with complex coordinates (qi,q~i)(q_i,\widetilde q_i). Let U(1)U(1) act with charges +1+1 on qiq_i and 1-1 on q~i\widetilde q_i. In a standard normalization,

μR=i(qi2q~i2)r,μC=iq~iqiζ.\begin{aligned} \mu_{\mathbb R}&=\sum_i\left(|q_i|^2-|\widetilde q_i|^2\right)-r,\\ \mu_{\mathbb C}&=\sum_i\widetilde q_iq_i-\zeta. \end{aligned}

For r>0r>0 and ζ=0\zeta=0, not all qiq_i can vanish. The complex quotient first chooses a point [q]CPn1[q]\in\mathbb{CP}^{n-1}; the equation q~q=0\widetilde q\cdot q=0 makes q~\widetilde q a cotangent vector at that point. Hence

Hn/ ⁣/ ⁣/U(1)TCPn1,\mathbb H^n/\!/\!/U(1)\simeq T^*\mathbb{CP}^{n-1},

with real dimension 4(n1)4(n-1). For n=2n=2 the smooth quotient is the Eguchi–Hanson space, a resolution of C2/Z2\mathbb C^2/\mathbb Z_2. Sending the triplet of FI parameters to zero collapses the exceptional two-sphere and restores the cone singularity.

What supersymmetry does and does not protect

Section titled “What supersymmetry does and does not protect”

The classical quotient identifies a metric inherited from the microscopic kinetic terms. Whether that metric is exact is theory-dependent:

SettingBranch geometryTypical quantum status
4d N=1\mathcal N=1KählerKähler potential and metric can receive perturbative and nonperturbative corrections.
4d N=2\mathcal N=2 Higgs branchHyperkählerMetric is protected under the standard rigid-theory assumptions; global identifications still require care.
4d N=2\mathcal N=2 Coulomb branchSpecial KählerMetric generally receives one-loop and instanton corrections.
3d N=4\mathcal N=4 Higgs branchHyperkählerHiggs-branch metric is protected in the usual decoupled rigid setting.
3d N=4\mathcal N=4 Coulomb branchHyperkählerMetric is typically corrected, including monopole effects.

The reason is not that all hyperkähler metrics are immutable. Rather, the multiplets containing Higgs-branch coordinates and couplings constrain how those couplings can enter the low-energy action. Compactification, gauging flavor symmetries, coupling to gravity, or mixing branches can invalidate the simplest protection statement. The metrics and corrections page separates these hypotheses carefully.

Equating complex varieties with metrics. Two FI chambers can be biholomorphic in a patch yet carry different Kähler classes. Conversely, a quantum correction can change the metric without changing the complex coordinate ring.

Forgetting regularity. The dimension subtraction and smooth quotient metric assume a regular moment-map value and a locally free action. At a stabilizer jump, use a stratified quotient and inspect the light spectrum.

Calling an N=1\mathcal N=1 quotient hyperkähler. Kähler reduction needs one moment map; hyperkähler reduction needs a triplet and a tri-holomorphic action. The additional structure comes from eight supercharges or an equivalent geometric input.

For the hyperkähler quotient of H2\mathbb H^2 by U(1)U(1) above:

  1. Verify its real dimension.
  2. Show that at r>0r>0, ζ=0\zeta=0, the locus q~=0\widetilde q=0 is a copy of CP1\mathbb{CP}^1.
  3. Explain why this sphere collapses at r=0r=0.
Solution

The starting dimension is eight. Three moment-map equations and one compact quotient remove four real dimensions, leaving four. With q~=0\widetilde q=0, the real equation is q12+q22=r|q_1|^2+|q_2|^2=r; quotienting its S3S^3 by U(1)U(1) gives CP1\mathbb{CP}^1. Its Kähler area is proportional to rr, so it collapses as r0r\to0. At the origin the U(1)U(1) stabilizer returns, and the quotient becomes the singular cone C2/Z2\mathbb C^2/\mathbb Z_2.

  • Hitchin, Nigel J., Anders Karlhede, Ulf Lindström, and Martin Roček. “Hyperkähler Metrics and Supersymmetry.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 108 (1987): 535–589. doi:10.1007/BF01214418.
  • Zumino, Bruno. “Supersymmetry and Kähler Manifolds.” Physics Letters B 87 (1979): 203–206. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90964-X.
  • Alvarez-Gaumé, Luis, and Daniel Z. Freedman. “Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 80 (1981): 443–451. doi:10.1007/BF01208280.