Skip to content

Kähler and Hyperkähler Quotients in Supersymmetric QFT

Supersymmetry equips many vacuum spaces with more than a complex structure. Four-dimensional N=1\mathcal N=1 Higgs branches arise locally as Kähler quotients, while eight-supercharge Higgs branches arise as hyperkähler quotients. The quotient equations determine the inherited geometry at the classical level; nonrenormalization requires a separate argument and depends on the number of supercharges and on which branch is studied.

Required background. F- and D-flatness supplies the vacuum equations, and moment maps supplies symplectic reduction. Helpful background. Kähler sigma models explains how the quotient metric becomes a low-energy kinetic term.

Let a compact group GG act holomorphically and isometrically on a Kähler manifold (X,g,J,ω)(X,g,J,\omega). For generators kak_a, a moment map satisfies

ιkaω=−dμa.\iota_{k_a}\omega=-d\mu_a.

The minus sign is fixed by this volume’s simultaneous choices ω=igijˉdzi∧dzˉjˉ\omega=i g_{i\bar j}dz^i\wedge d\bar z^{\bar j}, kai=i(Ta)ijzjk_a^i=i(T_a)^i{}_jz^j, and μa=z†Taz\mu_a=z^\dagger T_a z. Sources that define ιkω=+dμ\iota_k\omega=+d\mu use the opposite moment-map sign and must also reverse the quoted level.

At a regular central geometric level rr, with GG acting freely and properly, the quotient

X/ ⁣/rG=μ−1(r)/GX/\!/_{r}G=\mu^{-1}(r)/G

is Kähler. Its tangent space at an orbit can be represented by vectors orthogonal to both the orbit directions kak_a and their complex partners JkaJk_a. Restricting gg to this horizontal subspace gives the quotient metric. This is the smooth reduction theorem of Hitchin, Karlhede, Lindström, and Roček 1987, § 3C, Theorem 3.1, pp. 547–548, after reversing their moment-map sign to the convention displayed above. The appearance of Kähler target geometry in four-supercharge sigma models is the result of Zumino 1979, pp. 203–206.

In an N=1\mathcal N=1 gauge theory, first restrict XX to the F-flat locus. When that locus is a smooth GCG_{\mathbb C}-invariant complex submanifold, the D equation and compact quotient produce its Kähler reduction. If the action has stabilizers or the level is not regular, smooth reduction no longer applies. For compact GG and a proper moment map, singular reduction instead decomposes into symplectic orbit-type pieces; Sjamaar and Lerman 1991, Introduction, pp. 376–377, § 2, Theorem 2.1 and proof, pp. 382–388, and § 6, Theorem 6.11 gives the decomposition and its stratification. Under the additional hypotheses that the action extends globally and holomorphically to GCG_{\mathbb C} and that the required analytic quotient exists, the orbit-type strata are complex and their reduced forms are Kähler; see Sjamaar 1995, § 2.1, Theorem 2.9, pp. 108–109. Outside these hypotheses, regularity and separation properties must be checked directly.

A useful local calculation integrates out a massive vector multiplet in superspace. For chiral fields Φ\Phi with charges qiq_i and an abelian vector VV,

K(Φ,Φˉ,V)=∑iΦˉie−2gqiVΦi−2ξV.K(\Phi,\bar\Phi,V) =\sum_i\bar\Phi_i e^{-2gq_iV}\Phi_i-2\xi V.

This is the preceding chapter’s convention: Dμ=∂μ−igAμD_\mu=\partial_\mu-igA_\mu, P=gμ+ξ\mathcal P=g\mu+\xi, and the geometric level is r=−ξ/gr=-\xi/g. At energies below the vector mass and neglecting its derivative terms,

0=∂K∂V=−2g∑iqiΦˉie−2gqiVΦi−2ξ0=\frac{\partial K}{\partial V} =-2g\sum_iq_i\bar\Phi_i e^{-2gq_iV}\Phi_i-2\xi

is precisely P=0\mathcal P=0. Substituting the solution V(Φ,Φˉ)V(\Phi,\bar\Phi) back into KK produces a Kähler potential for the quotient in a chosen patch. Different gauge choices change this potential by Kähler transformations while leaving the metric invariant.

For the classical reduction of nn charge-one fields at r=−ξ/g>0r=-\xi/g>0, the vector equation reads

e−2gV∑i∣Φi∣2=r.e^{-2gV}\sum_i|\Phi_i|^2=r.

This is only a classical Kähler-reduction fixture: the all-charge-one spectrum has a four-dimensional U(1)3U(1)^3 gauge anomaly (and a mixed gravitational U(1)U(1) anomaly), so a quantum gauge-theory realization needs anomaly-free spectator or completion data that preserve the displayed quotient sector.

Choose the complex gauge patch Φn≠0\Phi_n\neq0 and define wa=Φa/Φnw_a=\Phi_a/\Phi_n for a=1,…,n−1a=1,\ldots,n-1. Solving the vector equation and discarding a constant and a Kähler transformation gives

Kquot=rlog⁡ ⁣(1+∑a=1n−1∣wa∣2).K_{\mathrm{quot}}=r\log\!\left(1+\sum_{a=1}^{n-1}|w_a|^2\right).

Thus the quotient metric is the Fubini–Study metric on CPn−1\mathbb{CP}^{n-1} with Kähler class proportional to rr:

gabˉ=r(1+∣w∣2)δabˉ−wˉawb(1+∣w∣2)2.g_{a\bar b} =r\frac{(1+|w|^2)\delta_{a\bar b}-\bar w_a w_b} {(1+|w|^2)^2}.

The coordinate patch fails where Φn=0\Phi_n=0, but the metric does not. On overlaps, the local Kähler potentials differ by F(w)+F(w)‾F(w)+\overline{F(w)}.

For a mixed-charge, anomaly-free example, the same reduction also displays a global chamber transition. In the figure, compare the two nonzero-level Kähler quotients before following their dashed contractions: stability keeps a different exceptional CP1\mathbb{CP}^1 on either side of r=0r=0, whereas the zero-level affine invariant quotient collapses it and develops the conifold singularity. This is an ordinary Kähler quotient; no hyperkähler structure is being assumed.

Flatness for an anomaly-free U(1) theory leads to two stability-selected smooth small resolutions at positive and negative geometric level; both contract to the zero-level determinantal cone, whose generic rank-one stratum has trivial stabilizer but whose origin restores the U(1) vector and four charged chiral multiplets.

Exact classical quotient fixture for G=U(1)G=U(1) with charges (+1,+1,−1,−1)(+1,+1,-1,-1), canonical KK, and W=0W=0. In the site convention P=gμ+ξ\mathcal P=g\mu+\xi, D-flatness is μ=r\mu=r with r=−ξ/gr=-\xi/g. The r>0r>0 and r<0r<0 stability choices give the two smooth small resolutions; degree-zero invariants at r=0r=0 give det⁡M=0\det M=0. The rank-one stratum has complex dimension three and trivial stabilizer, whereas at the origin the determinant Jacobian vanishes and the vector plus all four charged chirals are massless. The canonical derivation and primary-source locator accompany this fixture. The drawing is schematic and not to scale. Exact equations, adjacency, and independent checks (JSON).

Three moment maps and hyperkähler reduction

Section titled “Three moment maps and hyperkähler reduction”

A hyperkähler manifold has a metric gg and complex structures I,J,KI,J,K obeying the quaternionic relations, with closed two-forms ωI,ωJ,ωK\omega_I,\omega_J,\omega_K. A tri-holomorphic GG action has three moment maps

ιkaωA=−dμAa,A=I,J,K.\iota_{k_a}\omega_A=-d\mu_A^a, \qquad A=I,J,K.

The hyperkähler quotient is

X/ ⁣/ ⁣/r⃗G=μ⃗−1(r⃗)/G.X/\!/\!/_{\vec r}G =\vec\mu^{-1}(\vec r)/G.

Here r⃗\vec r denotes the three geometric moment-map levels. For the displayed quotient by all of GG, r⃗\vec r must be fixed by the coadjoint action (equivalently, it lies in the central part of g∗⊗R3\mathfrak g^*\otimes\mathbb R^3), so that GG preserves the level set. FI parameters in a gauge theory obey this centrality condition, and only those central levels are considered below. At a non-invariant value, only the common stabilizer Gr⃗G_{\vec r} preserves the fibre; quotienting by that subgroup is a different reduction problem and is not covered by the HKLR theorem or the 4dim⁡G4\dim G count used here. Each component must also be translated from the microscopic FI coupling using the action’s sign and coupling normalization; r⃗\vec r is not the same symbol as ξ⃗\vec\xi.

The construction and its supersymmetric interpretation are due to Hitchin, Karlhede, Lindström, and Roček 1987, § 3D, Theorem 3.2, pp. 549–550, again translated from their opposite moment-map sign.

At a regular value and for a free action, it removes 4dim⁡G4\dim G real dimensions:

dim⁡R(X/ ⁣/ ⁣/G)=dim⁡RX−4dim⁡G.\dim_{\mathbb R}(X/\!/\!/G) =\dim_{\mathbb R}X-4\dim G.

In one chosen complex structure, combine two real equations into the complex moment map μC=μJ+iμK\mu_{\mathbb C}=\mu_J+i\mu_K and retain μR=μI\mu_{\mathbb R}=\mu_I. Then

X/ ⁣/ ⁣/G≃μC−1(rC)ss/ ⁣/GC,X/\!/\!/G \simeq \mu_{\mathbb C}^{-1}(r_{\mathbb C})^{\mathrm{ss}}/\!/G_{\mathbb C},

with stability fixed by rRr_{\mathbb R}. The double slash is essential for a possibly singular quotient: semistable orbit closures meeting the same closed orbit are identified. Only when stable equals semistable and the relevant orbits are closed and free may this be replaced by an ordinary orbit space; see Sjamaar 1995, § 2.1, Proposition 2.2 and Theorem 2.3, pp. 105–107. This form closely parallels F-flatness followed by a D-term quotient.

Worked example: cotangent bundles of projective space

Section titled “Worked example: cotangent bundles of projective space”

Take flat Hn≃Cn⊕(Cn)∗\mathbb H^n\simeq\mathbb C^n\oplus(\mathbb C^n)^* with complex coordinates (qi,q~i)(q_i,\widetilde q_i). Let U(1)U(1) act with charges +1+1 on qiq_i and −1-1 on q~i\widetilde q_i. In complex structure II, choose

ωI=i∑i(dqi∧dqˉi+dq~i∧dq~‾i),ωJ+iωK=i∑idqi∧dq~i.\omega_I =i\sum_i\left(dq_i\wedge d\bar q_i +d\widetilde q_i\wedge d\overline{\widetilde q}_i\right), \qquad \omega_J+i\omega_K =i\sum_i dq_i\wedge d\widetilde q_i.

With this phase of the holomorphic symplectic form, the site convention ιkωA=−dμA\iota_k\omega_A=-d\mu_A gives the unshifted maps below without an extra factor of ii. Their level equations are

μ^R=∑i(∣qi∣2−∣q~i∣2)=r,μ^C=∑iq~iqi=ζ.\begin{aligned} \widehat\mu_{\mathbb R}&=\sum_i\left(|q_i|^2-|\widetilde q_i|^2\right)=r,\\ \widehat\mu_{\mathbb C}&=\sum_i\widetilde q_iq_i=\zeta. \end{aligned}

For r>0r>0 and ζ=0\zeta=0, not all qiq_i can vanish. The complex quotient first chooses a point [q]∈CPn−1[q]\in\mathbb{CP}^{n-1}; the equation q~⋅q=0\widetilde q\cdot q=0 makes q~\widetilde q a cotangent vector at that point. Hence

Hn/ ⁣/ ⁣/U(1)≃T∗CPn−1,\mathbb H^n/\!/\!/U(1)\simeq T^*\mathbb{CP}^{n-1},

with real dimension 4(n−1)4(n-1). For n=2n=2 the smooth quotient is the Eguchi–Hanson space, a resolution of C2/Z2\mathbb C^2/\mathbb Z_2. Sending the triplet of FI parameters to zero collapses the exceptional two-sphere and restores the cone singularity.

What supersymmetry does and does not protect

Section titled “What supersymmetry does and does not protect”

The classical quotient identifies a metric inherited from the microscopic kinetic terms; the quotient construction alone does not prove that this metric survives quantum corrections. The canonical protection table separates the assumptions and failure modes for 4d N=1\mathcal N=1, 4d N=2\mathcal N=2, and 3d N=4\mathcal N=4 Higgs and Coulomb branches.

In particular, hyperkähler geometry by itself does not imply an exact metric. Protection follows from how the branch coordinates and couplings sit in supersymmetry multiplets, and it can fail after compactification, flavor gauging, coupling to gravity, or branch mixing.

Equating complex varieties with metrics. Two FI chambers can be biholomorphic in a patch yet carry different Kähler classes. Conversely, a quantum correction can change the metric without changing the complex coordinate ring.

Forgetting regularity. The dimension subtraction and smooth quotient metric assume a regular moment-map value and a locally free action. At a stabilizer jump, use a stratified quotient and inspect the light spectrum.

Calling an N=1\mathcal N=1 quotient hyperkähler. Kähler reduction needs one moment map; hyperkähler reduction needs a triplet and a tri-holomorphic action. The additional structure comes from eight supercharges or an equivalent geometric input.

For the hyperkähler quotient of H2\mathbb H^2 by U(1)U(1) above:

  1. Verify its real dimension.
  2. Show that at r>0r>0, ζ=0\zeta=0, the locus q~=0\widetilde q=0 is a copy of CP1\mathbb{CP}^1.
  3. Explain why this sphere collapses at r=0r=0.
Solution

The starting dimension is eight. Three moment-map equations and one compact quotient remove four real dimensions, leaving four. With q~=0\widetilde q=0, the real equation is ∣q1∣2+∣q2∣2=r|q_1|^2+|q_2|^2=r; quotienting its S3S^3 by U(1)U(1) gives CP1\mathbb{CP}^1. Its Kähler area is proportional to rr, so it collapses as r→0r\to0. At the origin the U(1)U(1) stabilizer returns, and the quotient becomes the singular cone C2/Z2\mathbb C^2/\mathbb Z_2.

  • Hitchin, Nigel J., Anders Karlhede, Ulf Lindström, and Martin Roček. “Hyperkähler Metrics and Supersymmetry.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 108 (1987): 535–589. doi:10.1007/BF01214418.
  • Sjamaar, Reyer. “Holomorphic Slices, Symplectic Reduction and Multiplicities of Representations.” Annals of Mathematics 141 (1995): 87–129. doi:10.2307/2118628.
  • Sjamaar, Reyer, and Eugene Lerman. “Stratified Symplectic Spaces and Reduction.” Annals of Mathematics 134 (1991): 375–422. doi:10.2307/2944350.
  • Zumino, Bruno. “Supersymmetry and Kähler Manifolds.” Physics Letters B 87 (1979): 203–206. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90964-X.
  • Alvarez-Gaumé, Luis, and Daniel Z. Freedman. “Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 80 (1981): 443–451. doi:10.1007/BF01208280.

Original QFT.org content:CC BY 4.0, unless an item supplies different terms. Third-party material retains its own terms.