Gauge–Matter Systems, F- and D-Term Potentials, and FI Data
A rigid four-dimensional gauge–matter theory is determined at two derivatives by a Kähler target with a holomorphic gauge-group action, a gauge-invariant superpotential, a holomorphic gauge kinetic matrix, and any globally admissible Fayet–Iliopoulos data. The chiral auxiliaries measure failure of F-flatness; the vector auxiliaries are shifted moment maps. Eliminating both gives
with in the convention below. Positivity requires positive Kähler and gauge kinetic matrices. The formula is not complete until representations, global gauge form, moment-map normalization, anomaly status, and FI admissibility are recorded.
Required background. Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Actions fixes the vector normalization, Kähler Sigma Models fixes , and Hamiltonian Group Actions and Moment Maps supplies the geometric moment map.
Helpful background. Global Form, Matter Representations, and the Faithful Gauge Group explains why the Lie algebra alone does not determine the model.
Gauge invariance is a condition on all defining data
Section titled “Gauge invariance is a condition on all defining data”Let act on chiral coordinates through holomorphic Killing vectors ,
For a linear unitary representation, . Define the real moment map by
with the conjugate relation. For canonical this gives . An additive constant is possible only along an Abelian generator; that is the local origin of FI data.
The complete superspace action is schematically
where the final term is present only for admissible Abelian factors and its factor is tied to the chosen normalization. Gauge invariance requires:
- the Kähler metric and symplectic form to be preserved by the action;
- to obey for an ordinary rigid gauge symmetry;
- to transform as an invariant symmetric tensor, including any chiral-field dependence;
- the matter representation to descend to the declared global group; and
- perturbative and global gauge anomalies to cancel.
A Kähler potential may transform by a holomorphic plus antiholomorphic term while the metric and rigid action remain invariant. That local freedom must not be confused with a globally defined FI constant or with an allowed supergravity coupling.
Auxiliary elimination produces the full scalar potential
Section titled “Auxiliary elimination produces the full scalar potential”Suppressing fermion-dependent auxiliary shifts, the component auxiliary sector is
where and . Varying independent barred and unbarred fields gives
Completing both squares yields
so the potential is the positive expression in the opening when and are positive. The classical supersymmetric-vacuum equations are
modulo gauge equivalence, provided the metric matrices are nonsingular. These equations define a candidate classical vacuum space; stability, singular strata, invariant coordinates, and quantum corrections are treated in the next chapter.
For canonical matter, the principal fermion interactions are
in addition to gauge-covariant kinetic terms. A nontrivial Kähler metric replaces by and covariantizes the gauge Yukawa term; field-dependent adds gaugino–matter couplings. These interactions are not optional decorations: their coefficients are fixed by the same superspace action as and . The canonical construction is worked out in Weinberg 2000, §§27.1 and 27.4, pp. 113–121 and 132–143.
An anomaly-free Abelian model checks every coefficient
Section titled “An anomaly-free Abelian model checks every coefficient”Take with chiral fields and of charges and , canonical , constant canonical gauge kinetic term, and
The opposite charges cancel the cubic and mixed gravitational anomalies in this two-field sector, and is gauge invariant. With FI parameter ,
Therefore
The corresponding Yukawa terms are
Three checks are immediate.
- Setting reproduces two massive chiral multiplets.
- Setting leaves the D-flat equation modulo .
- For , F-flatness requires ; a nonzero then leaves , so no supersymmetric classical vacuum exists in this model.
The third conclusion is model-specific. It does not say that every FI theory breaks supersymmetry; additional charged fields or another superpotential can solve all auxiliary equations.
FI terms carry global and current-theoretic conditions
Section titled “FI terms carry global and current-theoretic conditions”A constant linear term is gauge invariant only when labels an Abelian direction admitting an invariant linear functional. A semisimple non-Abelian algebra has no such invariant vector. Even for , one must record:
- the compact or noncompact global group and charge normalization;
- whether the FI parameter is compatible with large gauge transformations, boundaries, and the allowed bundles;
- cancellation of gauge and mixed anomalies;
- whether the is an ordinary symmetry or an symmetry; and
- which supercurrent multiplet and background coupling remain globally available.
In a rigid local superspace calculation, is supersymmetric and gauge invariant up to the usual chiral/full-superspace identity. But the Ferrara–Zumino multiplet obtained by a standard improvement is not gauge invariant in the presence of a genuine FI term. This obstruction and its consequences are established in Komargodski and Seiberg 2010, §§1, 3.1, pp. 2–4 and 11–13, Open PDF. It is therefore wrong to infer background or supergravity compatibility from the local scalar potential alone.
A gauge–matter checklist
Section titled “A gauge–matter checklist”Before accepting a potential or vacuum equation, verify:
| field | required record |
|---|---|
| gauge data | global group, Lie algebra basis, , charges, coupling placement, theta sectors |
| chiral data | target patch, positive , representation and faithful quotient |
| holomorphic data | gauge invariance and dimensions of ; covariance and positivity of |
| moment map | sign, additive constants, coupling factor, and equivariance |
| FI data | Abelian direction, global admissibility, anomaly and supercurrent implications |
| elimination | independent , algebraic Hessian, branch and positivity |
| quantum scope | regulator, scheme, Wilsonian/1PI destination and possible anomalies |
The independent round trip is to recover the same and equations from the component action, from the superfield equations, and from the derivative of the final potential with respect to the auxiliary completion.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”Writing from charges but omitting g. Whether appears in the moment map or in the kinetic matrix depends on normalization. Translate the whole vector multiplet, not just .
Adding an FI constant to a non-Abelian generator. A constant shift must be invariant under the adjoint action; semisimple factors do not permit it.
Checking only infinitesimally. The representation and operator must also be well-defined under the global gauge group, including quotient identifications and large transformations.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”1. Positivity by completing the square. Complete the square for a positive matrix .
Solution
Thus and .
2. Gauge invariance of the mass term. Verify the charge of and explain why is forbidden.
Solution
, so the mass term is invariant. , so it is not an operator of the compact gauge theory without an additional field or spurion carrying charge .
Where the equations lead
Section titled “Where the equations lead”F- and D-Flatness and Gauge Quotients constructs the quotient and its singular strata. Supercurrent Multiplets, Improvements, Anomalies, and Background Sources records the FI obstruction, and SQCD: Fields, Symmetries, Invariants, and Classical Moduli Space applies the framework to non-Abelian matter.
References
Section titled “References”- Komargodski, Zohar, and Nathan Seiberg. “Comments on Supercurrent Multiplets, Supersymmetric Field Theories and Supergravity.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2010, no. 7 (2010): 017. DOI. Open PDF, arXiv v4.
- Weinberg, Steven. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume III: Supersymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, §§27.1 and 27.4, pp. 113–121 and 132–143. DOI.
Further reading
Section titled “Further reading”- Wess, Julius, and Jonathan Bagger. Supersymmetry and Supergravity. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992, chs. 6, 22, and 24.