Skip to content

The Affleck–Dine–Seiberg Superpotential

For massless SU(Nc)SU(N_c) SQCD with 0<Nf<Nc0<N_f<N_c and Wtree=0W_{\rm tree}=0, the exact Wilsonian superpotential is

WADS=(NcNf)(Λ3NcNfdetM)1/(NcNf).W_{\rm ADS} =(N_c-N_f) \left(\frac{\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}}{\det M}\right)^{1/(N_c-N_f)}.

Symmetry, holomorphy, and dimension fix the functional form; a controlled Nf=Nc1N_f=N_c-1 instanton fixes the initial coefficient; holomorphic decoupling fixes the coefficient for every lower NfN_f. The massless theory has a runaway rather than a finite supersymmetric vacuum.

Required background. The SQCD theory card fixes MM, baryon number, R-charge, global form, and Λ\Lambda. Nonperturbative superpotentials supplies the general holomorphy and spurion logic.

Helpful background. Instantons, zero modes, and condensates gives the controlled calculation at Nf=Nc1N_f=N_c-1.

Assume:

  • four-dimensional rigid N=1\mathcal N=1 supersymmetry;
  • gauge group SU(Nc)SU(N_c), not only gauge algebra su(Nc)\mathfrak{su}(N_c);
  • 0<Nf<Nc0<N_f<N_c pairs Q,Q~Q,\widetilde Q in fundamental and antifundamental representations;
  • vanishing tree superpotential and no additional singlets;
  • meson Miȷ~=Q~aȷ~QaiM_i{}^{\tilde\jmath}=\widetilde Q_a{}^{\tilde\jmath}Q^a{}_i with no powers of Λ\Lambda absorbed;
  • B(Q)=+1B(Q)=+1, B(Q~)=1B(\widetilde Q)=-1; and
  • Λ3NcNf=μ3NcNfexp[8π2/gh2+iθ]\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}=\mu^{3N_c-N_f}\exp[-8\pi^2/g_h^2+i\theta].

For Nf<NcN_f<N_c, no baryon can be formed and MM is the only polynomial gauge-invariant coordinate. At a generic point the unbroken gauge group is SU(NcNf)SU(N_c-N_f), so the fractional power below also records the vacuum branches of that strong sector.

Symmetry and dimension leave one candidate

Section titled “Symmetry and dimension leave one candidate”

Let k=NcNf>0k=N_c-N_f>0 and b0=3NcNfb_0=3N_c-N_f. The exact nonanomalous R-charge is

R(M)=2(1NcNf)=2kNf.R(M)=2\left(1-\frac{N_c}{N_f}\right) =-\frac{2k}{N_f}.

Therefore

R(detM)=NfR(M)=2k.R(\det M)=N_fR(M)=-2k.

A superpotential has R-charge two, so (detM)1/k(\det M)^{-1/k} has exactly the required charge. Engineering dimensions give the same exponent:

dimΛb0=3NcNf,dimdetM=2Nf,\dim\Lambda^{b_0}=3N_c-N_f, \qquad \dim\det M=2N_f,

and their difference is 3(NcNf)=3k3(N_c-N_f)=3k. Taking the kkth root produces dimension three. Flavor and baryon symmetries allow no additional tensor. Thus

W=Ck(Λb0detM)1/k,W=C_k \left(\frac{\Lambda^{b_0}}{\det M}\right)^{1/k},

where holomorphy alone leaves the number CkC_k undetermined. This is the important logical pause: symmetry finds a one-dimensional space of candidates, not a nonzero coefficient.

At Nf=Nc1N_f=N_c-1, a generic large meson expectation value completely Higgses SU(Nc)SU(N_c). A one-instanton calculation is weakly coupled, the Higgs expectation value cuts off the size integral, and Yukawa interactions lift every zero mode except the universal two. With the conventions above it gives

W=Λ2Nc+1detM,W=\frac{\Lambda^{2N_c+1}}{\det M},

so C1=1C_1=1. This is the controlled dynamical input of Affleck, Dine, and Seiberg 1984, pp. 493–534.

Suppose the answer for NfN_f flavors is W=kYW=kY, with

Y=(Λ3NcNfxdetM)1/k,Y=\left(\frac{\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}} {x\det M'}\right)^{1/k},

where x=MNfN~fx=M_{N_f}{}^{\widetilde N_f} and MM' is the light-flavor block. Add Wtree=mxW_{\rm tree}=mx. The xx equation is

0=Wx=Yx+m,x=Ym.0=\frac{\partial W}{\partial x} =-\frac{Y}{x}+m, \qquad x=\frac{Y}{m}.

Substitution gives

Yk+1=mΛ3NcNfdetM=ΛL3Nc(Nf1)detM,Y^{k+1} =\frac{m\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}}{\det M'} =\frac{\Lambda_L^{3N_c-(N_f-1)}}{\det M'},

where ΛL3Nc(Nf1)=mΛ3NcNf\Lambda_L^{3N_c-(N_f-1)}=m\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}. The low-energy superpotential becomes

WL=(k+1)Y.W_L=(k+1)Y.

Starting from C1=1C_1=1, this recursion yields Ck=k=NcNfC_k=k=N_c-N_f. It simultaneously checks the exponent, threshold power, and branch count. The same chain is summarized in Intriligator and Seiberg 1996, § 4.1, pp. 12–15.

The shorthand

(Λb0detM)1/k\left(\frac{\Lambda^{b_0}}{\det M}\right)^{1/k}

has kk local branches. They are the gaugino-condensate branches of the unbroken SU(k)SU(k) sector at a generic meson point. A path around detM=0\det M=0 permutes them. The expression is therefore not a globally single-valued ordinary function on the punctured meson space; it is branch data for the effective theory.

The singularity at detM=0\det M=0 is physical. There the chosen description has integrated out degrees of freedom that become important, and the unbroken gauge group is larger. One should not smooth the singularity by choosing an arbitrary root or by treating MM as the only weakly coupled field there.

Add a nonsingular mass matrix,

Wtot=WADS+tr(mM).W_{\rm tot}=W_{\rm ADS}+\operatorname{tr}(mM).

Define

S(Λ3NcNfdetM)1/(NcNf).S\equiv \left(\frac{\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}}{\det M}\right)^{1/(N_c-N_f)}.

The matrix F-term is

m=SM1,M=Sm1.m=S M^{-1}, \qquad M=Sm^{-1}.

Taking determinants and using the definition of SS gives

SNc=Λ3NcNfdetm.S^{N_c}=\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}\det m.

Thus there are NcN_c supersymmetric solutions,

Sk=(Λ3NcNfdetm)1/Nce2πik/Nc,S_k= \left(\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}\det m\right)^{1/N_c} e^{2\pi ik/N_c},

and at each solution

Wk=NcSk.W_k=N_cS_k.

This is precisely pure-SYM gaugino condensation after the scale match

ΛSYM3Nc=detmΛ3NcNf.\Lambda_{\rm SYM}^{3N_c} =\det m\,\Lambda^{3N_c-N_f}.

The calculation is an independent consistency loop: ADS plus masses reproduces the pure-gauge vacuum count and superpotential. The mass-deformed vacuum analysis and its decoupling interpretation are developed in Seiberg 1994, pp. 6857–6863.

For m=0m=0, differentiating WADSW_{\rm ADS} gives an inverse power of MM that cannot vanish at any finite nonsingular meson. Along M=t21M=t^2\mathbf1 with tt\to\infty,

WADSΛ(3NcNf)/kt2Nf/k0,W_{\rm ADS}\sim \Lambda^{(3N_c-N_f)/k}t^{-2N_f/k}\longrightarrow0,

and the F-term potential approaches zero. The theory therefore has a supersymmetric runaway at infinity, not a normalizable finite vacuum on this branch.

This distinction matters for index arguments. Sending the mass to zero moves the NcN_c massive-theory vacua to infinite field values, so the asymptotic behavior of field space changes and the naive finite-volume index-continuity slogan does not apply.

The ADS term is an exact Wilsonian F-term. It does not determine the Kähler metric near strong coupling, and a potential estimate that uses a canonical metric outside the large-field regime is not exact.

Worked example: SU(3)SU(3) with one flavor

Section titled “Worked example: SU(3)SU(3)SU(3) with one flavor”

Here b0=8b_0=8, k=2k=2, and MM is one complex field:

W=2(Λ8M)1/2+mM.W=2\left(\frac{\Lambda^8}{M}\right)^{1/2}+mM.

The F-term gives M=S/mM=S/m and

S3=mΛ8.S^3=m\Lambda^8.

There are three massive vacua, as required after the flavor decouples to pure SU(3)SU(3). When m0m\to0, MΛ8/3m2/3|M|\sim|\Lambda|^{8/3}|m|^{-2/3}\to\infty: the vacua do not remain at the origin but escape along the ADS runaway.

Using the formula at Nf=NcN_f=N_c. The exponent diverges because the correct object changes: the next regime has a quantum-modified constraint, not an ADS superpotential.

Calling symmetry a coefficient calculation. Symmetry and holomorphy fix the monomial. The nonzero coefficient requires an instanton anchor, decoupling, or another dynamical input.

Forgetting the branch. The fractional root represents the vacua of an unbroken gauge sector. A principal-value root erases physical monodromy.

  1. Check that the ADS superpotential has baryon number zero and R-charge two.
Solution

MM has baryon number zero, so both detM\det M and the full expression do. The exact R-symmetry leaves Λb0\Lambda^{b_0} invariant, while R(detM)=2(NcNf)R(\det M)=-2(N_c-N_f). Raising its inverse to 1/(NcNf)1/(N_c-N_f) gives R-charge two.

  1. Decouple one flavor from the Nf=Nc1N_f=N_c-1 result and recover the coefficient two for Nf=Nc2N_f=N_c-2.
Solution

Set k=1k=1 in the recursion above. Eliminating the massive meson entry gives Y2=ΛL2Nc+2/detMY^2=\Lambda_L^{2N_c+2}/\det M', and the low-energy superpotential is WL=2YW_L=2Y. Hence

WL=2(ΛL2Nc+2detM)1/2,W_L=2\left(\frac{\Lambda_L^{2N_c+2}}{\det M'}\right)^{1/2},

which is the ADS formula with Nf=Nc2N_f=N_c-2.

  • Affleck, Ian, Michael Dine, and Nathan Seiberg. “Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric QCD.” Nuclear Physics B 241 (1984): 493–534. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90058-0.
  • Intriligator, Kenneth, and Nathan Seiberg. “Lectures on Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Electric-Magnetic Duality.” Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 45BC (1996): 1–28. doi:10.1016/0920-5632(95)00626-5. Open PDF.
  • Seiberg, Nathan. “Exact Results on the Space of Vacua of Four-Dimensional SUSY Gauge Theories.” Physical Review D 49 (1994): 6857–6863. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6857. Open PDF.