Skip to content

The Trace Ward Identity and Weyl Anomaly

The trace Ward identity is the local equation that distinguishes a fixed-point Weyl anomaly from ordinary running, explicit masses, improvements, and contact terms. Its clean derivation starts from the generating functional with spacetime-dependent sources. The resulting trace is an operator-valued distribution; equations that hold away from other insertions need not include all of its contact terms. The local-RG derivation, including derivative-of-source terms, is given in Osborn 1991, §§2–3.

Required background. Weyl Covariance on Curved Backgrounds fixes the source and stress-tensor signs. Local RG and Trace Identities supplies the away-from-fixed-point framework. Helpful background. What Is an Anomaly? separates anomalous symmetry response from explicit breaking.

Work in Euclidean signature with W=−log⁡ZW=-\log Z. Let gI(x)g^I(x) be dimensionless sources for renormalized operators [OI][\mathcal O_I], coupled with a plus sign in the Euclidean action. The metric stress tensor and scalar insertions are fixed by

δW=12∫g ⟨Tμν⟩δgμν+∫g ⟨[OI]⟩δgI.\delta W=\frac12\int\sqrt g\,\langle T^{\mu\nu}\rangle\delta g_{\mu\nu} +\int\sqrt g\,\langle[\mathcal O_I]\rangle\delta g^I.

Write the ordinary mass-scale beta function as βμI=μ dgI/dμ\beta_\mu^I=\mu\,dg^I/d\mu at fixed bare theory. The local transformation combines δσgμν=2σgμν\delta_\sigma g_{\mu\nu}=2\sigma g_{\mu\nu} with δσgI=σβμI\delta_\sigma g^I=\sigma\beta_\mu^I. Using ordinary coordinate-density functional derivatives, its generator is

Δσ=∫ddx σ(2gμνδδgμν+βμIδδgI)+⋯ .\Delta_\sigma =\int d^dx\,\sigma\left( 2g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\delta}{\delta g_{\mu\nu}} +\beta_\mu^I\frac{\delta}{\delta g^I} \right)+\cdots.

There is no additional g\sqrt g in this coordinate-derivative measure. To check the sign, consider a constant physical length rr: the dependence on μr\mu r and the Callan–Symanzik equation imply r∂rW=−βμI∂IW+local termsr\partial_rW=-\beta_\mu^I\partial_IW+\text{local terms}. A beta function defined by increasing length instead satisfies βlength=−βμ\beta_{\rm length}=-\beta_\mu.

Osborn uses WO=+log⁡ZW_O=+\log Z and a positive inverse-metric Weyl generator ΔσW\Delta^W_\sigma. Denote his combined metric-and-coupling operator by Δσ,O=ΔσW−Δσβ\Delta_{\sigma,O}=\Delta^W_\sigma-\Delta^\beta_\sigma. Metric inversion gives Δσ=−Δσ,O\Delta_\sigma=-\Delta_{\sigma,O}, while W=−WOW=-W_O; the two changes leave the anomaly functional on the right unchanged. His action-defined stress has the opposite sign to the metric stress here. These translations fix the beta sign without changing the coupling flow Osborn 1991, printed preprint pp. 5–6, Eqs. (2.1)–(2.5), PDF.

The omitted terms act on background gauge fields and include derivatives of σ\sigma required by vector beta functions and improvements. Renormalization gives

ΔσW=∫ddxg [σA+∂μσ Zμ+⋯].\Delta_\sigma W=\int d^dx\sqrt g\, \big[\sigma\mathcal A+\partial_\mu\sigma\,\mathcal Z^\mu+\cdots\big].

For constant sources and away from coincident insertions, this implies schematically

Tμμ=−βμI[OI]+∇μJμ+A[g]+explicit relevant-source terms.T^\mu{}_{\mu} =-\beta_\mu^I[\mathcal O_I] +\nabla_\mu J^\mu +\mathcal A[g] +\text{explicit relevant-source terms}.

The current divergence includes any retained improvement or virial contribution. Relevant sources have their own Weyl weights: for engineering dimension Δ\Delta and before anomalous mixing, a source JJ transforms classically as δσJ=(Δ−d)σJ\delta_\sigma J=(\Delta-d)\sigma J, giving the trace contribution (d−Δ)JO(d-\Delta)J\mathcal O. The displayed beta and stress conventions must be translated together when comparing sources.

At a conformal fixed point with no virial obstruction, βμI=0\beta_\mu^I=0 modulo redundant flavor rotations. On a curved background the trace can still equal A[g]\mathcal A[g]. In flat space the smooth curvature density vanishes, but differentiating the generating functional produces anomalous contact terms in stress-tensor correlators.

Fixed-point anomalies in two and four dimensions

Section titled “Fixed-point anomalies in two and four dimensions”

For a nonchiral two-dimensional CFT with cL=cR=cc_L=c_R=c on a closed surface, the inherited positive round-sphere curvature and the displayed metric variation give

⟨Tμμ⟩=−c24πR.\langle T^\mu{}_{\mu}\rangle =-\frac{c}{24\pi}R.

Here the holomorphic tensor T(z)=2πTzzT(z)=2\pi T_{zz} has its usual OPE normalization, ⟨T(z)T(0)⟩=c/(2z4)\langle T(z)T(0)\rangle=c/(2z^4). Relevant local counterterms have been separated, and the partition function is normalized to realize this local anomaly. Integrating a constant Weyl rescaling on the round sphere gives

dWdlog⁡r=−c3,∫S2g R=8π.\frac{dW}{d\log r}=-\frac{c}{3}, \qquad \int_{S^2}\sqrt g\,R=8\pi.

For a real scalar, omitting the constant eigenfunction gives Wdet=12log⁡det⁡′ΔW_{\rm det}=\tfrac12\log\det'\Delta, with Δ=−∇2\Delta=-\nabla^2. Normalizing the constant-field volume independently of the metric instead gives WCFT=12log⁡(det⁡′Δ/A)W_{\rm CFT}=\tfrac12\log(\det'\Delta/A) and the displayed c=1c=1 response. Thus the area factor is necessary when using this scalar determinant as a check. The finite Weyl formula and the explicit distinction are derived in Conformal anomalies and Liouville theory, using Sarnak 1990, §1, pp. 603–605, PDF. This scalar example is not a definition of every interacting CFT.

In four dimensions, the parity-even purely gravitational anomaly in the same metric-stress convention is

⟨Tμμ⟩=1(4π)2(a E4−c Cμνρσ2+bm ∇2R),\langle T^\mu{}_{\mu}\rangle =\frac{1}{(4\pi)^2} \left(a\,E_4-c\,C_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}^2+b_m\,\nabla^2R\right),

with

E4=Rμνρσ2−4Rμν2+R2.E_4=R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}^2-4R_{\mu\nu}^2+R^2.

Here CμνρσC_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} is the Weyl tensor, and a,ca,c retain their conventional positive free-field values. The aa and cc coefficients multiply nontrivial anomaly densities. The coefficient bmb_m is shifted by a finite ∫g R2\int\sqrt g\,R^2 counterterm and is therefore scheme dependent, realizing the nontrivial-versus-removable classification of Deser and Schwimmer 1993, printed preprint pp. 2–3, PDF.

For a direct sign check, a real conformal scalar has P=−∇2+R/6P=-\nabla^2+R/6 and W=12log⁡det⁡(P/μ2)W=\tfrac12\log\det(P/\mu^2) when PP is positive and invertible. Zeta variation gives δσW=−A4(σ,P)\delta_\sigma W=-A_4(\sigma,P), whose local heat-coefficient density has universal part (4π)−2(C2/120−E4/360)(4\pi)^{-2}(C^2/120-E_4/360). Thus a=1/360a=1/360, c=1/120c=1/120 in the displayed trace. Vassilevich defines stress by the positive inverse-metric derivative of the same WW, so his trace is the negative of ours Vassilevich 2003, printed preprint p. 40, Eq. (4.28), and pp. 65–66, Eqs. (7.1)–(7.8), PDF.

On a round S4S^4, ∫g E4=64π2\int\sqrt g\,E_4=64\pi^2, C2=0C^2=0 and PP has no zero mode. Therefore the universal logarithm obeys

dWdlog⁡r=4a=190.\frac{dW}{d\log r}=4a=\frac1{90}.

The spectral scaling Pr=r−2P1P_r=r^{-2}P_1 gives the same result, since ζP(0)=−1/90\zeta_P(0)=-1/90. Renormalization scales are held fixed; cosmological and Einstein counterterms can add separate power-law terms. Boundaries introduce additional surface densities, so none of these closed-manifold integrals is a complete boundary formula.

A trace insertion at coincident points needs a prescription for the other operators. For a concrete check, take the conformally improved free massless scalar in flat d>2d>2 and keep its elementary insertions fixed under metric variation. With Δϕ=(d−2)/2\Delta_\phi=(d-2)/2 and the vacuum subtraction understood,

Tμμ=−Δϕ: ⁣ϕ∇2ϕ ⁣:,−∇2G(x,y)=δ(d)(x−y).T^\mu{}_\mu=-\Delta_\phi:\!\phi\nabla^2\phi\!:, \qquad -\nabla^2G(x,y)=\delta^{(d)}(x-y).

The two connected Wick contractions give

⟨Tμμ(x)ϕ(y)ϕ(z)⟩c=−Δϕ[G(x,y)∇x2G(x,z)+G(x,z)∇x2G(x,y)]=Δϕ[δ(d)(x−y)+δ(d)(x−z)]G(y,z).\begin{aligned} \langle T^\mu{}_\mu(x)\phi(y)\phi(z)\rangle_c &=-\Delta_\phi\big[ G(x,y)\nabla_x^2G(x,z)+G(x,z)\nabla_x^2G(x,y)\big]\\ &=\Delta_\phi\big[\delta^{(d)}(x-y)+\delta^{(d)}(x-z)\big]G(y,z). \end{aligned}

The positive contact sign follows from the stated stress and Green-function conventions. Thus the flat-space trace vanishes at separated points but acts nontrivially as a distribution.

For a general source-defined composite, differentiating the generating functional also differentiates the operator’s metric and source dependence, normalization, mixing and counterterms. Those additional local terms cannot be inferred from the elementary example by substituting a general scaling dimension. The local-RG prerequisite derives the source-differentiated identity with these terms retained.

The two arrows from the renormalized generating functional separate fixed-point CFT data (A) from local Weyl response (B). Inspect how these distinct inputs enter the calculations below, without an arrow that would turn endpoint comparison into an automatic flow theorem.

The renormalized generating functional supplies separated-point fixed-point CFT data and local Weyl response. These are inputs to distinct deformation and sphere calculations; endpoint flow conclusions require additional theorem hypotheses.

Schematic dependencies, not to scale. For W=−log⁡ZW=-\log Z and positive covariant-metric variation, the trace contains A[g]−βμI[OI]\mathcal A[g]-\beta_\mu^I[\mathcal O_I], where βμI=μ dgI/dμ\beta_\mu^I=\mu\,dg^I/d\mu at fixed bare theory. The ellipsis retains the stated derivative, relevant-source and insertion-contact qualifications. Choosing finite counterterms changes local response without changing separated-point data at fixed normalization. Letters identify inputs to distinct calculations; the dashed endpoint arrow requires dimension-specific theorem hypotheses.

An equivalent text description is:

Starting datumRenormalized outputInvariant conclusion
Metric sourceStress-tensor insertions plus local metric contactsSeparated-point TT data after normalization
Weyl variation at a fixed pointType-A and type-B densities plus trivial termsNontrivial anomaly coefficients only
Running scalar sources−βμI[OI]-\beta_\mu^I[\mathcal O_I] plus mixing and contactsFixed-point values and scheme-covariant flow statements
Round-sphere backgroundRadius dependence, finite terms, and zero-mode factorsDimension-dependent universal part
Integrated deformationUV singularities and countertermsBeta functions or anomalous dimensions after basis and scheme are fixed

Before calling a trace contribution anomalous, ask whether it is the Weyl variation of a finite local functional. In four dimensions,

δσ∫d4xg R2=−12∫d4xg σ∇2R\delta_\sigma\int d^4x\sqrt g\,R^2 =-12\int d^4x\sqrt g\,\sigma\nabla^2R

on a closed manifold. Hence adding κ∫g R2/(4π)2\kappa\int\sqrt g\,R^2/(4\pi)^2 shifts bmb_m by −12κ-12\kappa. By contrast, no diffeomorphism-invariant local counterterm shifts the Euler and Weyl-squared coefficients while preserving the same fixed-point problem.

An improvement term changes TμμT^\mu{}_{\mu} by ∇2L\nabla^2L. Whether it can remove a virial or trace term depends on the existence, dimension, and global definition of LL. A statement about scale versus conformal invariance must therefore name the improvement hypothesis rather than deleting total derivatives formally.

Setting Tμμ=0T^\mu{}_{\mu}=0 as an operator distribution. At a CFT it vanishes at separated flat-space points after improvement, but Ward-identity contacts and curved-space anomalies remain.

Calling the beta term an anomaly. A nonzero βIOI\beta^I\mathcal O_I describes running under a chosen coupling parametrization. A fixed-point Weyl anomaly remains even when beta functions vanish.

Treating ∇2R\nabla^2R as universal in four dimensions. Its coefficient changes under a finite R2R^2 counterterm. Only a declared scheme makes a numerical value meaningful.

Use the two-dimensional anomaly to compute the response of WW to a constant rescaling of a round S2S^2.

Solution

Let rr denote the sphere radius and RR its scalar curvature. With δσ=δlog⁡r\delta\sigma=\delta\log r and the anomaly-normalized CFT partition function,

δW=−c24π δlog⁡r∫S2g R=−c3 δlog⁡r.\delta W=-\frac{c}{24\pi}\,\delta\log r\int_{S^2}\sqrt g\,R =-\frac c3\,\delta\log r.

Gauss–Bonnet supplied ∫gR=8π\int\sqrt gR=8\pi. For a scalar determinant, the constant-mode normalization must be the one described above; 12log⁡det⁡′Δ\tfrac12\log\det'\Delta alone has a different radius response.

  • Deser, S., and Schwimmer, A. “Geometric Classification of Conformal Anomalies in Arbitrary Dimensions.” Physics Letters B 309 (1993): 279–284. DOI. Open PDF; the locators above use the printed preprint pages.
  • Osborn, H. “Weyl Consistency Conditions and a Local Renormalization Group Equation for General Renormalisable Field Theories.” Nuclear Physics B 363 (1991): 486–526. DOI.
  • Sarnak, P. “Determinants of Laplacians; Heights and Finiteness.” In Analysis, et cetera, edited by P. H. Rabinowitz and E. Zehnder, 601–622. Academic Press, 1990. Open PDF.
  • Vassilevich, D. V. “Heat Kernel Expansion: User’s Manual.” Physics Reports 388 (2003): 279–360. DOI. Open PDF: arXiv:hep-th/0306138v3; printed preprint page labels are used above.

Original QFT.org content:CC BY 4.0, unless an item supplies different terms. Third-party material retains its own terms.