Skip to content

Angular-momentum projection diagonalizes two-body rotational kinematics. With a declared normalization, SS-matrix unitarity then becomes a separate circle condition for each elastic partial wave and an inequality when inelastic channels open. The circle’s radius, center, and threshold powers are normalization-dependent; the eigenvalue SS_\ell is the invariant object.

Required background. S-Matrix Unitarity supplies the operator relation. Relativistic Scattering Kinematics supplies center-of-mass variables and thresholds.

Fix the four-dimensional scalar normalization

Section titled “Fix the four-dimensional scalar normalization”

For equal-mass spinless 222\to2 scattering, let

z=cosθ,ρ(s)=14m2s=2pcms.\begin{aligned} z&=\cos\theta,\\ \rho(s)&=\sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{s}} =\frac{2p_{\mathrm{cm}}}{\sqrt{s}}. \end{aligned}

and expand

M(s,z)=16π=0(2+1)a(s)P(z).\mathcal M(s,z) =16\pi\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)a_\ell(s)P_\ell(z).

Orthogonality gives

a(s)=132π11dzP(z)M(s,z).a_\ell(s) =\frac{1}{32\pi}\int_{-1}^{1}\mathrm dz\, P_\ell(z)\mathcal M(s,z).

The coefficients are fixed rather than guessed: multiplying the expansion by PL(z)P_L(z) and using

11dzPL(z)P(z)=22+1δL\int_{-1}^{1}\mathrm dz\,P_L(z)P_\ell(z) =\frac{2}{2\ell+1}\delta_{L\ell}

leaves 32πaL32\pi a_L. Projecting the two-body part of the unitarity state sum with the same identity makes different \ell values orthogonal and yields Ima=ρa2\operatorname{Im}a_\ell=\rho|a_\ell|^2 when no other channel is open.

Define

S(s)=1+2iρ(s)a(s).S_\ell(s)=1+2i\rho(s)a_\ell(s).

Below the first inelastic threshold, unitarity requires

S=1,S=e2iδ,a=eiδsinδρ.\begin{aligned} |S_\ell|&=1, &S_\ell&=e^{2i\delta_\ell},\\ a_\ell&=\frac{e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell}{\rho}. \end{aligned}

Consequently,

Ima=ρa2.\operatorname{Im}a_\ell =\rho|a_\ell|^2.

Weinberg derives the relativistic partial-wave decomposition, phase shifts, and threshold behavior in Weinberg 1995, § 3.7, printed pp. 151–159.

Introduce the dimensionless amplitude b=ρab_\ell=\rho a_\ell. In the elastic region,

(Reb)2+(Imb12)2=14.(\operatorname{Re}b_\ell)^2 +\left(\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-\frac12\right)^2 =\frac14.

When additional channels open, write

S=ηe2iδ,0η1.S_\ell=\eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, \qquad 0\le\eta_\ell\le1.

Then

Imbb2=1η240,\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-|b_\ell|^2 =\frac{1-\eta_\ell^2}{4}\ge0,

so bb_\ell lies inside the elastic circle. The distance of SS_\ell from the unit circle, not a change of plotting convention, measures lost elastic probability. The same diagonal-channel parametrization and its multichannel interpretation are stated in Particle Data Group 2025, review 50, § 50.1.3, printed pp. 8–9, PDF.

Elastic partial-wave amplitudes lie on a circle centered at imaginary one half with radius one half; all values with zero to less than unit inelasticity fill its interior disk, while the phase fixes the angular position.

For b=ρa=(S1)/(2i)b_\ell=\rho a_\ell=(S_\ell-1)/(2i), elastic unitarity is the circle (Reb)2+(Imb1/2)2=1/4(\operatorname{Re}b_\ell)^2+(\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-1/2)^2=1/4; the full range 0η<10\le\eta_\ell<1 fills the interior disk, rather than a distinguished inner circle or universal inward trajectory. The plot is dimensionless and schematic; any energy-dependent path inside the disk is model dependent.

The equivalent semantic data are:

RegimeSS_\ellbb_\ell constraint
No scattering1100
Elastice2iδe^{2i\delta_\ell}On the circle, b=eiδsinδb_\ell=e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell
Inelasticηe2iδ\eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, 0η<10\le\eta_\ell<1Inside the circle; deficit (1η2)/4(1-\eta_\ell^2)/4

With several two-body channels, the scalar SS_\ell becomes a matrix SabS_\ell^{ab} in channel space. Unitarity is SS=1S_\ell^\dagger S_\ell=1 when all open channels in that sector are retained. Diagonalizing this matrix gives eigenphases on the unit circle; looking only at one elastic entry gives Saa1|S_\ell^{aa}|\le1, with its deficit supplied by transitions to bab\ne a. The single-channel η\eta_\ell parametrization is therefore a projection of multichannel unitary evolution, not a new source of nonunitarity.

For identical particles, form normalized symmetrized or antisymmetrized two-body states before importing these equations. For identical spinless bosons in a symmetric internal state, only even \ell occur. One may integrate the full labeled sphere with exactly one final-state factor 1/2!1/2!, or one representative half-sphere without it. A common normalized-channel convention uses 32π32\pi rather than 16π16\pi in the identical-boson expansion; the corresponding SS_\ell relation changes. Preserving the eigenvalue SS_\ell is the safe translation check.

For distinguishable elastic scalars,

σel=16πs=0(2+1)a2.\sigma_{\mathrm{el}} =\frac{16\pi}{s} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)|a_\ell|^2.

In the purely elastic region this equals the total cross section obtained from the optical theorem. The maximum contribution of one elastic partial wave follows from b1|b_\ell|\le1:

σ4π(2+1)pcm2.\sigma_\ell\le \frac{4\pi(2\ell+1)}{p_{\mathrm{cm}}^2}.

This is a partial-wave bound at fixed energy, not a statement that the full cross section saturates it.

For a short-range interaction and no threshold singularity,

δpcm2+1,apcm2\delta_\ell\sim p_{\mathrm{cm}}^{2\ell+1}, \qquad a_\ell\sim p_{\mathrm{cm}}^{2\ell}

near threshold. Long-range massless exchange and finely tuned near-threshold states can invalidate this simple scaling. Higher-dimensional harmonic analysis, conformal partial waves, and phenomenological coupled-channel fits use related ideas but different bases and normalizations. Continue to resonance poles and sheets for the analytic meaning of a partial-wave pole; a fitted Argand trajectory alone does not turn an unstable state into an asymptotic particle.

Some sources absorb ρ\rho into the partial amplitude or use 32π32\pi rather than 16π16\pi in the expansion. Do not compare their circles by eye. Compute SS_\ell in each convention and demand the same eigenvalue. The phase shift, inelasticity, pole positions, and partial cross section then provide convention-independent checks.

Starting from S=1+2ibS_\ell=1+2ib_\ell, impose S=1|S_\ell|=1 and complete the square to recover the Argand circle. Then set S=ηe2iδS_\ell=\eta e^{2i\delta} and derive the inelastic deficit. If your result places η<1\eta<1 outside the circle, a sign or normalization is wrong.

Solution

Writing b=x+iyb=x+iy, the equation 1+2ib2=(12y)2+4x2=1|1+2ib|^2=(1-2y)^2+4x^2=1 becomes x2+(y1/2)2=1/4x^2+(y-1/2)^2=1/4. More generally, 1+2ib2=η2|1+2ib|^2=\eta^2 gives

y(x2+y2)=1η240,y-(x^2+y^2)=\frac{1-\eta^2}{4}\ge0,

so every 0η<10\le\eta<1 lies in the disk. For fixed η\eta, varying δ\delta traces a circle of radius η/2\eta/2 centered at i/2i/2; allowing the full inelasticity range fills the disk.

  • Particle Data Group. “Resonances.” In Review of Particle Physics, 2025 Update, review 50, § 50.1.3, printed pp. 8–9. Official PDF.
  • Weinberg, Steven. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1995, § 3.7, printed pp. 151–159. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644167.