Skip to content

Angular-momentum projection diagonalizes two-body rotational kinematics. With a declared normalization, SS-matrix unitarity then becomes a separate circle condition for each elastic partial wave and an inequality when inelastic channels open. The circle’s radius, center, and threshold powers are normalization-dependent; the eigenvalue SℓS_\ell is the invariant object.

Required background. S-Matrix Unitarity supplies the operator relation. Relativistic Scattering Kinematics supplies center-of-mass variables and thresholds.

Fix the four-dimensional scalar normalization

Section titled “Fix the four-dimensional scalar normalization”

For equal-mass spinless 2→22\to2 scattering, let

z=cos⁡θ,ρ(s)=1−4m2s=2pcms.\begin{aligned} z&=\cos\theta,\\ \rho(s)&=\sqrt{1-\frac{4m^2}{s}} =\frac{2p_{\mathrm{cm}}}{\sqrt{s}}. \end{aligned}

and expand

M(s,z)=16π∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)aℓ(s)Pℓ(z).\mathcal M(s,z) =16\pi\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)a_\ell(s)P_\ell(z).

Orthogonality gives

aℓ(s)=132π∫−11dz Pℓ(z)M(s,z).a_\ell(s) =\frac{1}{32\pi}\int_{-1}^{1}\mathrm dz\, P_\ell(z)\mathcal M(s,z).

The coefficients are fixed rather than guessed: multiplying the expansion by PL(z)P_L(z) and using

∫−11dz PL(z)Pℓ(z)=22ℓ+1δLℓ\int_{-1}^{1}\mathrm dz\,P_L(z)P_\ell(z) =\frac{2}{2\ell+1}\delta_{L\ell}

leaves 32πaL32\pi a_L. Projecting the two-body part of the unitarity state sum with the same identity makes different ℓ\ell values orthogonal and yields Im⁡aℓ=ρ∣aℓ∣2\operatorname{Im}a_\ell=\rho|a_\ell|^2 when no other channel is open.

Define

Sℓ(s)=1+2iρ(s)aℓ(s).S_\ell(s)=1+2i\rho(s)a_\ell(s).

Below the first inelastic threshold, unitarity requires

∣Sℓ∣=1,Sℓ=e2iδℓ,aℓ=eiδℓsin⁡δℓρ.\begin{aligned} |S_\ell|&=1, &S_\ell&=e^{2i\delta_\ell},\\ a_\ell&=\frac{e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell}{\rho}. \end{aligned}

Consequently,

Im⁡aℓ=ρ∣aℓ∣2.\operatorname{Im}a_\ell =\rho|a_\ell|^2.

Weinberg derives the relativistic partial-wave decomposition, phase shifts, and threshold behavior in Weinberg 1995, § 3.7, printed pp. 151–159.

Introduce the dimensionless amplitude bℓ=ρaℓb_\ell=\rho a_\ell. In the elastic region,

(Re⁡bℓ)2+(Im⁡bℓ−12)2=14.(\operatorname{Re}b_\ell)^2 +\left(\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-\frac12\right)^2 =\frac14.

When additional channels open, write

Sℓ=ηℓe2iδℓ,0≤ηℓ≤1.S_\ell=\eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, \qquad 0\le\eta_\ell\le1.

Then

Im⁡bℓ−∣bℓ∣2=1−ηℓ24≥0,\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-|b_\ell|^2 =\frac{1-\eta_\ell^2}{4}\ge0,

so bℓb_\ell lies inside the elastic circle. The distance of SℓS_\ell from the unit circle, not a change of plotting convention, measures lost elastic probability. The same diagonal-channel parametrization and its multichannel interpretation are stated in Particle Data Group 2025, review 50, § 50.1.3, printed pp. 8–9, PDF.

Elastic partial-wave amplitudes lie on a circle centered at imaginary one half with radius one half; all values with zero to less than unit inelasticity fill its interior disk, while the phase fixes the angular position.

For bℓ=ρaℓ=(Sℓ−1)/(2i)b_\ell=\rho a_\ell=(S_\ell-1)/(2i), elastic unitarity is the circle (Re⁡bℓ)2+(Im⁡bℓ−1/2)2=1/4(\operatorname{Re}b_\ell)^2+(\operatorname{Im}b_\ell-1/2)^2=1/4; the full range 0≤ηℓ<10\le\eta_\ell<1 fills the interior disk, rather than a distinguished inner circle or universal inward trajectory. The plot is dimensionless and schematic; any energy-dependent path inside the disk is model dependent.

The equivalent semantic data are:

RegimeSℓS_\ellbℓb_\ell constraint
No scattering1100
Elastice2iδℓe^{2i\delta_\ell}On the circle, bℓ=eiδℓsin⁡δℓb_\ell=e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell
Inelasticηℓe2iδℓ\eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, 0≤ηℓ<10\le\eta_\ell<1Inside the circle; deficit (1−ηℓ2)/4(1-\eta_\ell^2)/4

With several two-body channels, the scalar SℓS_\ell becomes a matrix SℓabS_\ell^{ab} in channel space. Unitarity is Sℓ†Sℓ=1S_\ell^\dagger S_\ell=1 when all open channels in that sector are retained. Diagonalizing this matrix gives eigenphases on the unit circle; looking only at one elastic entry gives ∣Sℓaa∣≤1|S_\ell^{aa}|\le1, with its deficit supplied by transitions to b≠ab\ne a. The single-channel ηℓ\eta_\ell parametrization is therefore a projection of multichannel unitary evolution, not a new source of nonunitarity.

For identical particles, form normalized symmetrized or antisymmetrized two-body states before importing these equations. For identical spinless bosons in a symmetric internal state, only even ℓ\ell occur. One may integrate the full labeled sphere with exactly one final-state factor 1/2!1/2!, or one representative half-sphere without it. A common normalized-channel convention uses 32π32\pi rather than 16π16\pi in the identical-boson expansion; the corresponding SℓS_\ell relation changes. Preserving the eigenvalue SℓS_\ell is the safe translation check.

For distinguishable elastic scalars,

σel=16πs∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)∣aℓ∣2.\sigma_{\mathrm{el}} =\frac{16\pi}{s} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)|a_\ell|^2.

In the purely elastic region this equals the total cross section obtained from the optical theorem. The maximum contribution of one elastic partial wave follows from ∣bℓ∣≤1|b_\ell|\le1:

σℓ≤4π(2ℓ+1)pcm2.\sigma_\ell\le \frac{4\pi(2\ell+1)}{p_{\mathrm{cm}}^2}.

This is a partial-wave bound at fixed energy, not a statement that the full cross section saturates it.

For a short-range interaction and no threshold singularity,

δℓ∼pcm2ℓ+1,aℓ∼pcm2ℓ\delta_\ell\sim p_{\mathrm{cm}}^{2\ell+1}, \qquad a_\ell\sim p_{\mathrm{cm}}^{2\ell}

near threshold. Long-range massless exchange and finely tuned near-threshold states can invalidate this simple scaling. Higher-dimensional harmonic analysis, conformal partial waves, and phenomenological coupled-channel fits use related ideas but different bases and normalizations. Continue to resonance poles and sheets for the analytic meaning of a partial-wave pole; a fitted Argand trajectory alone does not turn an unstable state into an asymptotic particle.

Some sources absorb ρ\rho into the partial amplitude or use 32π32\pi rather than 16π16\pi in the expansion. Do not compare their circles by eye. Compute SℓS_\ell in each convention and demand the same eigenvalue. The phase shift, inelasticity, pole positions, and partial cross section then provide convention-independent checks.

Starting from Sℓ=1+2ibℓS_\ell=1+2ib_\ell, impose ∣Sℓ∣=1|S_\ell|=1 and complete the square to recover the Argand circle. Then set Sℓ=ηe2iδS_\ell=\eta e^{2i\delta} and derive the inelastic deficit. If your result places η<1\eta<1 outside the circle, a sign or normalization is wrong.

Solution

Writing b=x+iyb=x+iy, the equation ∣1+2ib∣2=(1−2y)2+4x2=1|1+2ib|^2=(1-2y)^2+4x^2=1 becomes x2+(y−1/2)2=1/4x^2+(y-1/2)^2=1/4. More generally, ∣1+2ib∣2=η2|1+2ib|^2=\eta^2 gives

y−(x2+y2)=1−η24≥0,y-(x^2+y^2)=\frac{1-\eta^2}{4}\ge0,

so every 0≤η<10\le\eta<1 lies in the disk. For fixed η\eta, varying δ\delta traces a circle of radius η/2\eta/2 centered at i/2i/2; allowing the full inelasticity range fills the disk.

  • Particle Data Group. “Resonances.” In Review of Particle Physics, 2025 Update, review 50, § 50.1.3, printed pp. 8–9. Official PDF.
  • Weinberg, Steven. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1995, § 3.7, printed pp. 151–159. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644167.

Original QFT.org content:CC BY 4.0, unless an item supplies different terms. Third-party material retains its own terms.