Skip to content

Full Two-Dimensional CFT from Chiral Nets

A left–right tensor product of chiral nets is already a local net on two-dimensional double cones, but a full CFT generally contains additional charged fields. For completely rational chiral data, a commutative Q-system in the product of the left sector category with the reverse-braided right category constructs such a local extension. A modular-invariant multiplicity matrix is necessary data, not by itself sufficient data.

Required background. Conformal Nets and Covariance Axioms supplies the chiral local algebras, Extensions, Orbifolds, Cosets, and Alpha-Induction supplies extension criteria, and Chiral Blocks, Sewing, and Modular Invariance supplies the physical left–right decomposition. Helpful background. Conformal Boundaries and Defects explains why full centers also organize boundary conditions.

In two-dimensional Minkowski space with signature (+,)(+,-), use light-ray coordinates x±=t±xx^\pm=t\pm x. A double cone is O=I×JO=I\times J, where II is an interval on the left light ray and JJ one on the right. Given chiral nets AL\mathcal A_L and AR\mathcal A_R, the product subnet is

A2(O)=AL(I)AR(J).\mathcal A_2(O)= \mathcal A_L(I)\,\overline\otimes\,\mathcal A_R(J).

If two double cones are spacelike separated, their left intervals occur in one order and their right intervals in the opposite order. This reversal is why the relevant category is

DHR(AL)DHR(AR)rev.\operatorname{DHR}(\mathcal A_L) \boxtimes \operatorname{DHR}(\mathcal A_R)^{\mathrm{rev}}.

The product net inherits isotony, locality, vacuum, positive energy, and Möbius or diffeomorphism covariance factorwise. A full net B2\mathcal B_2 with the chosen chiral symmetry is a local covariant extension A2(O)B2(O)\mathcal A_2(O)\subset\mathcal B_2(O), consistently for every double cone. The common Hilbert space, unique vacuum, and finite-index inclusion are part of the hypotheses; a torus partition function alone supplies none of them.

Let the chiral nets be completely rational. Finite local extensions of A2\mathcal A_2 correspond to commutative Q-systems in the product category. If AA is a chiral Q-system, its full center Z(A)Z(A) is a canonical commutative Q-system in the left–right product; Morita-equivalent chiral Q-systems have equivalent full centers. Bischoff, Kawahigashi, and Longo prove that the generalized Longo–Rehren construction agrees with this categorical full center and classify maximal full nets by the resulting Morita classes Bischoff, Kawahigashi, and Longo 2015, §§4.1 and 6.1, pp. 1153–1160 and 1171–1173.

The mechanism is concrete. The Q-system multiplication defines products of charged generators, associativity makes the local algebra well defined, C*-positivity gives a Hilbert-space representation, and commutativity with the product braiding proves spacelike locality. Its sector decomposition determines a nonnegative integer coupling matrix ZijZ_{ij} with Z00=1Z_{00}=1. Alpha-induction then implies ZS=SZZS=SZ and ZT=TZZT=TZ. The arrows do not reverse: modular commutation does not supply the multiplication or positivity.

For a maximal full extension, several equivalent conclusions hold: maximal index, trivial DHR sector theory for the full net, and modular-invariant coupling. Proposition 6.6 of Bischoff, Kawahigashi, and Longo 2015, pp. 1174–1175 states the equivalence under complete rationality and finite irreducible inclusion. It is not a theorem about nonrational chiral theories or arbitrary integer matrices.

Take identical left and right Ising nets. In CIsingCIsingrev\mathcal C_{\mathrm{Ising}}\boxtimes\mathcal C_{\mathrm{Ising}}^{\mathrm{rev}}, the diagonal full-center object is

Θ=(11)(σσ)(εε).\Theta=(\mathbf1\boxtimes\mathbf1) \oplus(\sigma\boxtimes\sigma) \oplus(\varepsilon\boxtimes\varepsilon).

Reverse braiding on the right cancels the left monodromy, so the canonical multiplication is commutative. The vacuum summand occurs once, giving Z00=1Z_{00}=1, and the coupling matrix is the diagonal Ising invariant,

Z=χ12+χσ2+χε2.Z=\lvert\chi_{\mathbf1}\rvert^2+ \lvert\chi_\sigma\rvert^2+ \lvert\chi_\varepsilon\rvert^2.

This completes the exact local-net construction associated with Chiral Blocks, Sewing, and Modular Invariance: the blocks identify the sector pairing, while the full-center Q-system proves operator-algebraic locality and vacuum multiplicity.

There is an independent index check. Each Ising chiral net has μ=4\mu=4, the extension index is d(Θ)=4d(\Theta)=4, and the full-net index formula gives

μB2=μLμR[B2:A2]2=4442=1.\mu_{\mathcal B_2}= \frac{\mu_L\mu_R}{[\mathcal B_2:\mathcal A_2]^2} =\frac{4\cdot4}{4^2}=1.

Thus the diagonal full center is maximal and has no nontrivial DHR sectors, consistently with Proposition 6.6.

The double-cone locality check uses more structure than the symmetry of ZZ. Charged generators in spacelike-separated double cones exchange with the left braiding and the inverse right braiding; commutativity of the full-center multiplication cancels their product. Associativity then makes this exchange compatible with triple products, while the C*-relations supply adjoints and positivity. A torus partition function records only multiplicities of left–right sectors and cannot test any of these operator identities. It also does not determine the embeddings B2(O1)B2(O2)\mathcal B_2(O_1)\subset\mathcal B_2(O_2) or the vacuum representation. These are why a commutative Q-system is sufficient in the stated rational finite-index regime and a modular matrix is not.

In the Ising sector order (1,σ,ε)(\mathbf1,\sigma,\varepsilon), let M=diag(1,0,1)M=\operatorname{diag}(1,0,1). It has nonnegative integer entries, M00=1M_{00}=1, and commutes with the diagonal TT matrix. But it does not commute with the displayed Ising SS matrix: for example (MS)1σ=1/2(MS)_{\mathbf1\sigma}=1/\sqrt2 while (SM)1σ=0(SM)_{\mathbf1\sigma}=0. It is therefore rejected even as a modular invariant. More generally, a matrix commuting with both generators can still fail to arise from a positive local Q-system. The surviving conclusion is a numerical consistency candidate, not a full CFT.

Compute d(Θ)d(\Theta) for the diagonal Ising object and use the full-net index formula to test maximality.

Solution

The summand dimensions are 11, dσ2=2d_\sigma^2=2, and 11, hence d(Θ)=4d(\Theta)=4. With μL=μR=4\mu_L=\mu_R=4, the formula gives μB2=16/16=1\mu_{\mathcal B_2}=16/16=1. The full extension is maximal within the stated completely rational finite-index regime.