{
  "title": "Representative claim domains and validity boundaries for Lorentzian, Nonequilibrium, and Chaotic Holography",
  "table_id": "thermal-real-time-holography-claim-domain-table",
  "columns": [
    {
      "key": "claim_object",
      "label": "Claim object"
    },
    {
      "key": "state_ensemble_and_conventions",
      "label": "State, ensemble, and conventions"
    },
    {
      "key": "approximation_status_and_evidence_timing",
      "label": "Approximation, status, and evidence timing"
    },
    {
      "key": "uncertainty_and_counterevidence",
      "label": "Uncertainty and counterevidence"
    },
    {
      "key": "falsifier",
      "label": "Falsifier"
    },
    {
      "key": "failure_condition",
      "label": "Failure condition"
    },
    {
      "key": "licensed_conclusion",
      "label": "Licensed conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "records": [
    {
      "claim_object": {
        "text": "retarded response",
        "html": "retarded response"
      },
      "state_ensemble_and_conventions": {
        "text": "Declare source convention and infalling condition; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement.",
        "html": "Declare source convention and infalling condition; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement."
      },
      "approximation_status_and_evidence_timing": {
        "text": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026.",
        "html": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026."
      },
      "uncertainty_and_counterevidence": {
        "text": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “flux and Kramers-Kronig checks” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim.",
        "html": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “flux and Kramers-Kronig checks” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim."
      },
      "falsifier": {
        "text": "flux and Kramers-Kronig checks",
        "html": "flux and Kramers-Kronig checks"
      },
      "failure_condition": {
        "text": "all Schwinger-Keldysh correlators",
        "html": "all Schwinger-Keldysh correlators"
      },
      "licensed_conclusion": {
        "text": "a causal Green function",
        "html": "a causal Green function"
      }
    },
    {
      "claim_object": {
        "text": "quasinormal mode",
        "html": "quasinormal mode"
      },
      "state_ensemble_and_conventions": {
        "text": "Declare background, channel, and boundary condition; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement.",
        "html": "Declare background, channel, and boundary condition; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement."
      },
      "approximation_status_and_evidence_timing": {
        "text": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026.",
        "html": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026."
      },
      "uncertainty_and_counterevidence": {
        "text": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “pole and convergence test” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim.",
        "html": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “pole and convergence test” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim."
      },
      "falsifier": {
        "text": "pole and convergence test",
        "html": "pole and convergence test"
      },
      "failure_condition": {
        "text": "nonlinear thermalization time",
        "html": "nonlinear thermalization time"
      },
      "licensed_conclusion": {
        "text": "linear relaxation scale",
        "html": "linear relaxation scale"
      }
    },
    {
      "claim_object": {
        "text": "scrambling or plateau",
        "html": "scrambling or plateau"
      },
      "state_ensemble_and_conventions": {
        "text": "Declare operator ordering, N, and time limits; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement.",
        "html": "Declare operator ordering, N, and time limits; use the volume conventions unless the page states a local replacement."
      },
      "approximation_status_and_evidence_timing": {
        "text": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026.",
        "html": "Model-specific calculation or conditional result. Control chain: real-time contour and state → Lorentzian bulk geometry → initial and horizon conditions → poles, response, and chaos tests → time-window conclusion. Sources are cited on the destination page; literature checked through 10 August 2026."
      },
      "uncertainty_and_counterevidence": {
        "text": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “OTOC or spectral benchmark” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim.",
        "html": "Track omitted corrections, alternate branches, and competing definitions. A failed “OTOC or spectral benchmark” check is counterevidence to the promoted claim."
      },
      "falsifier": {
        "text": "OTOC or spectral benchmark",
        "html": "OTOC or spectral benchmark"
      },
      "failure_condition": {
        "text": "exact finite-N irreversibility",
        "html": "exact finite-N irreversibility"
      },
      "licensed_conclusion": {
        "text": "behavior in the stated window",
        "html": "behavior in the stated window"
      }
    }
  ],
  "scope": "Exact structured equivalent of the reader-facing semantic table; column order, cell text, and source HTML are preserved."
}